Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

IT'S DEMOCRAT TIME

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-03 4:17

YO YO YOOOOO!  MOVE OVER REPUBLICANS!  IT'S TIME FOR SOME REAL GOVERNMENT!! OH YEAH!!! AHH AHH AHH YEEEEEEAAHH BOOOOYYY!

dEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWv

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 13:27

>>40
The Iraqis already have a civilisation.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 15:07

>>41
temporarily

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 17:24

>>42
No it's still a civilisation. It is the oldest civilisation on earth. An example of a civiliation crumbling would be Somalia after the Italians left and large portions of Zimbabwe after Mugabe came to power.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 18:12

>>43
What exactly is the difference? One is a civilisation, but the other isn't. Why?

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 13:18

  Bio/poltical warfare. We infect them with democrats and its the end of the world as they know it.

  >>40 Kipling was right. We probably shouldn't have taken that first step.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 15:17

>>44
Their masters do not enforce a code of law which seeks to increase productivity by preventing violence and organising efforts.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 15:59

>>46
That's quite arbitrary, don't you think?

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 17:39

>>47
That's quite ambiguous and arbitrary, don't you think?

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 17:58

>>48
It's only ambiguous if you're being purposely obtuse.

What is ambiguous about that question?

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 20:36

>>38

I wouldn't trade one American life to liberate a whole cage full of monkies.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 21:31

>>50
I would. Then I qould cybernetically modify the monkeys to take over the world MWAHAHAHAHAAA FLY MY PRETTIES

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 21:53

>>51
BANANA REPUBLIC BANANA REPUBLIC BANANA REPUBLIC

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-14 12:00

>>51
  When monkies fly out your butt and vote democrat.
 
  Did i mention that harry reid and nancy pelosi had a monkey out of wedlock?

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-14 12:01

It was a butt monkey

Name: Levon 2006-11-14 23:26

awwwwwwwwwwwwwww yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

gonna celebrate with $240 worth of pudding!

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-16 22:05

>>50
The idea is that we MAKE them into americans.  We go over there, and create a mini-america in the heart of the middle east - by military force.  Liberate the Iraqi people, put down an american-style government in place there, and let the Iraqi people sort it out at the elections.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-17 8:05

>>36
I LOLed.

>>37  
|N koreans have been shooting at them for years and you havn't said a word.

I personally have been saying all this time that we SHOULD have attacked NK, instead of Iraq.  Whether the S Koreans agree is another matter entirely, and should factor into any decision we make there. But why are you comparing N Ks shooting across the DMZ to the Germans, S Koreans, and Japanese not attacking us?

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-17 8:07

>>38
||"so lying about a BJ is worse than saying that they know where all the WMDs are and has exactly pinpointed them so they could go in and remove them? I think not.

3.5k deaths and rising vs a sexual act."
|We are liberating the Iraqi people.  Those 3.5 thousand people died for a good cause, no?
The BJ was a better cause, with far fewer casualties.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-17 8:12

>>56
I LOLed

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-17 12:08

>>56
Freedom: apply liberally via barrel of gun.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-17 22:53

>>57
  What i'm pointing out is that even though dems were in majority during ww2 and Korea They did mot come up with an exit strategy and we still have soldiers on continuous duty in theses places after 50+ years. I do note that J Carter suggested removing the troops in S Korea in the late 70's.
  Without the support of the Chinese an attack on NK would be expensive beyond any possible benefits. Which is precisely why we've (under the UN Command) been in a standoff there for 50 years.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-17 23:16

>>58
in typical liberal fashion you insist that the point is the bj instead of the lie. Your continuing dishonesty just illustrates the problem. What is truth?

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-17 23:21

>>62
No, because lying about whether you flushed the toliet and whether you accidently killed someone are totally different things, people lie all the fucking time, but not everyone is in prison.

Hence, some lies are more damaging that others.

GTFO 4chan moral absolutist.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-18 15:14

Truth is just a matter of opinion? Yes, it truly is democrat time. The truth is what you say it is till the black dress comes out. Or is it the Rather way? The story is true even if the evidence is forged. Or the say it often enough and it becomes the truth way.

gtfo 4chan moral ambiguist

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-18 15:15

what is truth?

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-18 19:06

Overbearing republicans, immoral democrats.

Name: anonymous 2006-11-18 19:42

Telling the truth is when you make a statement that matches up with (objective) reality. 

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-21 15:36

can't we have a political thread without mudsling?

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-22 16:29

You mean can we all just get along?? NO. Get rid of the Valium and whack somebody.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-15 8:24

52
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -