IT'S DEMOCRAT TIME

YO YO YOOOOO!  MOVE OVER REPUBLICANS!  IT'S TIME FOR SOME REAL GOVERNMENT!! OH YEAH!!! AHH AHH AHH YEEEEEEAAHH BOOOOYYY!

dEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWdEMOCRATsFTWv

>>25

"  The wmd's were assumed to be there because saddam and his
people wanted everyone to believe he had them and intentionally ran a bluff on the world. It is nonsense to believe he fooled everybody in the world BUT President Bush."

really? i'd like to see a source where saddam claimed to have nuclear weapons, or a program for them. many people in both our intel agencies and the brits knew he had nothing, and were vocal about it to the president, but were ignored in favor for those saying there were weapons, no matter how unfounded. let's also not forget that iraq was a target of the US long before 9/11.

i mean, where's the yellow cake from africa? where are the mobile bio-labs? where's the store houses of nerve agents and sarin gas that are still weapons grade? these are all things president bush said he knew saddam had. this is a case of, like i said, either cherry picked intel, horribly bad intel, misleading or outright lying. saddam did nothing to make as if he had any of that stuff, and if he did, it came from us when we were still buddy buddy with him almost a decade ago if not longer.

yeah clinton lied under oath, knowingly lied to the american people, and i do not support him in the least for those actions.
But considering it was within a sexual affair investigation, i dont think in the long run the lie did anything but to scare his name as president. i mean, of all the things to lie about that could potentially effect america and it's standing in the world,  'i did not have sex with that woman' isn't gonna cause a whole hellava lot of damage. no one but the president himself was harmed by this lie.
so it's a little unrealistic to me to compare a proven lie about a relativley unimportant thing from one president, over taking our country on a goose hunt war for which there was no planned way out by another president, even though there is no proven lie (yet).