>>30
In case anyone else happens to care about this thread, this is ignorance. I've already acknowledged the points anti-chan made, yet she repeats them endlessly, not even attempting to invalidate my point that the absence of facts which show that the west isn't 100% evil or at least an explanation as to why they were left out shows that the article writer is biased.
Either anti-chan agrees and is just trolling or anti-chan is an extremist of some sorts who absolutely cannot contemplate the idea that the west isn't 100% evil.