>>22
You just keep repeating things that I agree with and trying to pass them off as if I don't agree with them. You are beating down a straw man, so yes I have to keep reminding you that the straw man isn't me.
"The article is NOT saying: The West has no good values. You just fail at Reading comprehension."
The title of the article is "western values", yet the article writer clearly does not rank the values and facts in order of importance, but by whether they are evil or good values which are not followed. There are no instances or attempts to say that the article is focussing on evil western values for whatever reason. The article is biased and attempting to pass off al western values as evil. It doesn't have to clearly state it's malicious intentions, it's ignorant solid silence concerning good western values speaks volumes.
A = good western/black values
B = bad western/black values
C = the west/blacks is good and bad = the truth
D = the west/blacks only does good
E = the west/blacks only does bad
A+B implies C
A implies D
B implies E
Person F has reason to persuade person G to think E is occurring, so G only displays the information B.
The same logic that you use against racism, that racists generalise, ignore facts which go against their argument, blow small occurances way out of proportion, swap causes for effects and effects for causes despite the evidence to the contrary etc etc... is the same logic I am using to claim that this site is biased.