>>72 The constitution is an admittance and reflection of the human nature and situation. The rejection of government favoring or supressing any religion is good. Agnosticism is not a religion, nor a belief, and the admittance of the extent of human knowledge and the realization that reality has not been fully understood is a prerequisite of a stable civilization. Telling people that want government to side with their beliefs (You think there are few such Americans? Think again.) to STFU until they have complete proof that their belief is perfectly compatible with human nature and existence is not statism. Your argumentation is that this is not good, black and white, it violates a holy principle, this and that is sacred, thanks for playing, you are stupid, you need to shut the fuck up immediately,and we do not need to look at this from a practical perspective because it violates a theoretical threshold I don't want to define or argument about. I try to see your point and all I can discern is "Badgers badgers badgers badgers badgers badgers badgers badgers badgers badgers muuuushroom muuuushroom".