>>16
You don't
want to get it, do you?
For starters, if you don't visit FoxNews for a discussion, they just can't edit what you say
on their show. But they can still tell all sorts of lies about you, and this time you "didn't dare show your face" there. And if you're an activist for a specific cause, they can fuxxor that case (aswell as u) to no end, and you can't do buttkiss about it, cos they're too big and can afford too many lawyers.
One problem is all the sheeple out there, that fall for the "big lie" bluff (the more outrageous the lie, the more likely ppl/spl will think it can't be a lie cos why would someone this respectable lie about something this big...)
And then there's this magical newsletter. Look, I'm not saying freedom of speech doesn't exist
on paper, cos the ppl behind this part of the system ain't that dumb. You're not explicitly forbidden to speak up, or set up a small newsletter, or anysuch. Any of that crap would be spotted and removed faster than you can say "Nazi punks fuck off".
Rather, you need to have a shitload of money, or that small zine is gonna stay small. And in the long run, it's gonna achieve precious little in the way of getting alternative thoughts across.
That music thing is another side of the same problem; put out all the zines and stuff you want, you still
can't get the goddamn music itself! Which is why I love the internet. (Which in turn is why RIAA et al are getting pissed, but that's tl;dr even if it
is relevant...)
hitler was definitely a big-government loving leftist
Then why does everyone now see him as extreme
right-wing? Would it by any chance be cos the 1-D left/right chart is constrictive and uninformative (actually downright misleading) in charting political ideas? I mean, look at OP's link again. That chart's
2-D.
And as for armed gerillas fighting down the system: is that what happened in Waco, or Ruby Ridge? Wow.
Not that I mind a hunting rifle or two laying around, or a little something for self-defense. Just spare me the fanatics, OK? Fanatic gun-lovers, fanatic gun-haters, fanatic reps, fanatic deps, fanatic nazis, fanatic commies, fanatic christians... birds of a goddamn feather! Gimme a fkin
break, man!
You can critisize Bush all you want here, without fear of government reprisal.
However, the only time I've seen (corp) media dress anyone down for critisizing Bush for
not going far enough, it's been one from the Fred Phelps bunch.
Also, you seem to think I'm blaming Bush personally for everything that's bad in this world. Sorry to disappoint you, but I'm not that bigotted. For starters, he's a bit dim for that. But he's still a
part of the problem. In much the same way a figurehead is a part of a ship. And when I speak against Bush, it's Bush as a symbol, or even symptom, of why America's going to the dogs right now. That much I can see it even from over here, some 6,000 miles away.
Like those churches. They're no more gov-controlled than any of the Mid-Eastern Mullahs or Ayatollahs (outside of Iran where they
are the gov), but they can be every bit as rabidly mud-hut. And the audiences are equally controllable sheeple flocks. And they're both a blight on the planet for much the same reasons; for starters both have "hate weeks", whether it be for Rowling or Rushdie.
And this has been legitimized by Team Bush, mainly by polarizing the world so it's harder to be neutral, or even 3rd-party. Speaking of which; as for voting 3rd party, over here there's a 10th party. And an 11th. Roughly a dozen, with
real differences.