>>168
This is the most rediculous and far reaching argument in the history of arguments. Your reply has been "White man's" reply to minorities for the last 3 or 4 centuries. I have to admit, you were smart enough to play this bullshit game in the first place and I conmend you on your ability to keep it up this long. But it's over now.
Sorry.
Your reply is thus:
"Don't worry about being rich, successful or powerful. We'll take care it. You'll be happy; you'll see."
"Don't worry about who's shaping your future. It's us. Oh yeah; and also God and your dead big brother who died in Iraq."
We understand that "the future can only get better when you build it yourself"--- and we're saying that white privaledge is systematically preventing minorities from aquiring the proper building materials to secure that future. The problem is that
you want to control the future. That actually may have been possible during colonization, but then around 1940 or so the most radical thing happened: You lost control of modernization. You lost control of civilization. Don't be surprised, because civilization isn't something any one race of people can handle by themselves anyway.
Basically what "white man" asserts is that we continue to comply with his rape. From the first crusade it has been this way. And now you're doing the same thing here- trying to sell to me that it's
wrong to have an advantage over people who have more advantages than you do (white people) . Double Think is a method of brain washing. And your reply presents to us the two options what we can agree to simultaneously for purposes of self-indoctrinazation. Anyone who requires a brain washing method to confuse and sublimate isn't out for my best interests and is probably taking advantage of me.
So to uphold what "white man" saying is "right", I am to remain subservient and not expect the same advantages that he lords over us.
It's not a matter of perception that whites control a majority of the wealth. It's a fact. It's not politics. It's statistics.
Get it right.