>>48
I was under the impression you were trying to justify Sandinista rule. In the end both the sandinistas and the contras lost power as a result of US intervention. Today the Sandinistas are just a political party with some arms stashed somewhere which they dont intend to use and the contras have mostly disbanded and what is left have seperated and play little part in politics. Some americans did support the contras despite the fact that they were assholes, but if the US is guilty of anything it is guilty of not being able to stop all crime, which seems to be the top dollar argument for marxists these days. 1 AMERICAN COMMITTED A CRIME SOMETIME, THEREFORE DEMOCRACY IS A FAILURE AND WE NEED COMMUJISM!!
If I am a shame, I am a shame to my own ego and not libertarianism. The definition of libertarianism does not change just because I am not capable of constructing am argument that covers every fallacy a dumbass would believe in. I can however crush them 1 by 1 so keep them coming, it's fun, like a puzzle. Seriously though, are you like a master of fallacy creation or is there some structure to it? Do you study sociology or something?