Make English the universal language.

Fuck your culture, you heard me. Culture is just technology to be hand-picked at the INDIVIDUAL'S discretion, not something you have to indoctrinate your children from birth to believe has value even though it is obviously pointless. You have no right to FORCE your INFERIOR culture on people.

Everyone should speak 1 language to make things easier, if you want to learn other languages go right ahead, but don't let the fact you like shoving things up your ass or whatever you think is so great about your 'culture' interfere with making the world a better place.

I'm not trying to force my culture on you either, I don't give a fuck about English either, language should be totally logical, like equations or something, the simplest method of communicating possible. That way we can concentrate on pushing communication to new levels that were physically impossible with all the drivel we have to learn alongside inferior languages.

Discuss.

>>64
>All of this will be changed when it is converted into a logical language and exist in other languages.

There's probably another popular and up-to-date language which would provide a better base for building a universal language on.

>International science conferences are held in English

Science conferences are held in other languages too.

>English is the most up to date in terms of definitions.

Not as much that it would really matter, if at all.

>Explain the relevance of the amount of times a subject has been discussed.

Makes you look like an idiot, bringing the same arguments up all the time and always getting the same answers, then just ignoring them and starting anew.

>It's all very well repeating everything I say like a 12 year old, but do you have any proof to back up your assertions?

What assertions? That you continue to bring up irrelevant details, then whine when somebody responds? You admitted it yourself.

>As you can see right in front of your face, where English fails, it is no worse than other langauges and where it succeeds it is unique.

Actually, where it succeeds it's not unique, as I've told you several times. But where it fails, it fails hard. See my pointers above.

>Only individual ideas and technologies are logical classifications.

And I don't agree with your idea of adopting a crappy language just because it's popular currently. Deal with it. Another language can be popular in just decades. If you want to create a universal language, it better be an elegant and consistent one.