The Silent Scream

Still thinking about the abortion debate? Here's something everyone should see before they make up their mind.  There are five videos.  They should be listed below in the right order from segment one, to segment five.   

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqZDP9TeJxg&mode=related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yU_DQ_7NcDA&mode=related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JOOcS2Q_is&mode=related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMTMfrXaqRQ&mode=related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9AoG_uQ14M&mode=related&search=

>>14

"As long as the fetus can't live outside the womb of a living, breathing, voting woman, then it isn't just one life the government is protecting and possessing, it's two."

If you are trying to say the government should protect both the woman's, and the fetus' life, I agree.

"Consentual protection and possession by the society (the government) is a part of a social contract that assures liberty in exchange for this 'possession'. Non-consentual protection and possession is communism."

The government doesn't own or possess me or my body.  This isn't the soviet union.  Further, we do have non-consensual protection.  Whether or not I want to be protected from murderers by the police, the police will do it. 


"So does it, or doesn't it matter that if a man doesn't have all the information or feel safe enough in his knowledge about the woman he's about to have intercourse with?

It's good to see you're finally straying away from the "whose's responsibility" argument (one you were losing, horribly) and going with something else. It's just that your comments seem contradictory."

I will not stray away from that argument, and I wasn't losing it either.  If you want to continue this argument, continue it in that thread. 

This thread, is about the Silent Scream Video.  It has to do with whether or not abortion should be allowed, and again, also has to do with the video previously mentioned.