>>52
Yes? And how does that logically make the man responsible in each and every circumstance?
If the man and woman decide to have children, but the man leaves the woman by herself at the last minute, then the man is responsible for the baby via his cash since he made the agreement to use the woman's sexual organs and her eggs with his sperm to produce a baby and cannot back out of it. However if the man made it clear he did not want children, but the woman sabotaged her contraceptives anyway, then the man is not responsible.