>>14
You must have some deep seeded issues with women. I was reading this and I just thought:
"Now why would he do that? Why would he turn around and basically validate what I said?"
No. The justice system and the government are not wrong in this case. If you can properly express to me the flaw in expecting a man to accept his responsibilities as a father, I'd like to hear it. Because logically, if a woman doesn't have to "open her legs in first place" in the name of taking care of her own body...
...Then the man doesn't have to put his dick into a woman who he doesn't know well enough to avoid an unwanted pregnancy. You can hammer this "it's a woman's body, she should take care of it!" all day long. But this isn't about "a woman's body", this is about
the baby, and you can only get a baby via the coupling of two people of the opposite sex.
The fact is that most abortions are enacted at the request of the
male. And because the
male didn't practice abstenence. I don't know if you've ever had sex before, but...it does take a penis being inserted into a vagina in order for a baby to be made. It's not hard to apply the same "keep it in your pants" dogma that you force upon woman, to the man as well.
This just simple logic.