>>615 "Explain." The idea is that if one uses his freedom to act and be in the public to do unjustified harm to another person's rights then it is the freedom to act and be in public, not the damaged right, that is to be removed. DP is just eye for an eye. In the abortion debate, I believe that autonomy has only been established by a fetus once it has accumulated a unique, unimitatable individual persona, considering it's genetic code is as complex as that of the host, and it has even fewer biological faculties and processes than that of the host. As such, consciousness is not enough to justify murder, and the parents are not guilty of anything worse than an appendix procedure. As such, a nation can't ethically have a defense of a fetus' life on the *principle of consciousness* and still claim the right to off people.