>>572 "*laughs* Ok, I guess I'm missing something, or apparently people here think that gambling with children's lives, health, and well being, is 'good conscience'. Well sorry, I don't agree, and anyone with a decent code of ethics would find such a person repulsive."
Anyone with common sense would find the gamble is far harsher with the health of the woman, instead of the child.
"Wow, I hate how people continue to whine about things I never said. I never advocated putting laws down about who can and cannot have sex.
My comment was targetting something Kumori said calling women who gamble with children's lives 'acting in good conscience' or some such garbage. I think such activities are irresponsible, but I wouldn't think of banning them. In the future, how about you try *not* putting words in my mouth?"
He didn't put words in your mouth, he was asking you a question, and then commented about the thought. You are the one being quite whiney here, for flipping out on such a thing.
"If the health problems pose a significant risk for their children, they are *not* acting responsibly."
Oh yeah sure parents actually WANT to make their children be born with diseases. lolololhurhurhurhurhur *coughs*
"I think it is you that lacks common sense. If you have it, refute my arguments instead of whining, ok?"
Awww he wants a fight. =p
"If, however, the woman has a disease, and knowingly trys to have children regardless of a significant risk that might beset her future child, she is *not* acting compassionately or responsibly."
Take this scenario. The woman is clean and has no health disorders. The man loves drinking, and he has health/genetic problems. The couple wants to raise a family, and the man knowingly has diseases and despite that he wants a child. The man here would be held accountable. Then again, I don't believe in such garbage. As Xel mentions, "How's about creating life despite the twists of fate and making the best out of the genes you've got? That is a human right and you are appearing more and more authorative with each post."
"I don't belittle 'women', I belittle 'irresponsible women'. There is a huge difference, unless of course, *you* think *all* women are irresponsible. Just to let you know, that is a very sexist notion. So unless you are sexist, you must realize that my comments are not directed at women generally, but at a select few among the larger group of responsible and compassionate women. I never said all women are irresponsible, or that women generally were or are. You fail."
He is so funny.
""He's probably been preaching to himself for so long that it's become an automatic reflex for him to just shut down the majority of receiving information and to just shit out on everything against his views."
Funny how it sounds exactly like you, yet you direct this at me."
I believe the aformentioned is correct on Anon as well.