>>545
"I came from a long family line with a history of diabetes. However, I don't have diabetes even though my parents do, and I'm 22 years old. Just as long as I don't gorge myself on sugar/salt like a fat person eating cake and kill my pancreas then I won't develop diabetes. So Kumori's arguement with health problems is quite valid. I love my mother for being a strong woman and warrior at heart, to have me despite the risk to her health."
Kumori's 'argument' on health problems is *not* valid. You apparently misunderstood it. Kumori was saying that women who become pregnant while full of diseases that could jeopardize the health and life of her future children anyways so that she can fullfill her selfish desire to have children were 'brave' and acting in 'good conscience.'
This is not the case. Women who know they are full of diseases, and become pregnant anyways (knowing full well that these diseases have a good chance of jeopardizing her children's well being and life) are *not* 'brave' or 'acting in good conscience.'
These women are gambling with the lives and health of their future children to satisfy *their* selfish desires to have their own children, when there are perfectly fine children availible for adoption with no health problems, that could be adopted resulting in *no* risk to the woman's future children's lives and well being. They are irresponsible and uncompassionate.