>>477
"Your view of sex is completely fucked up. Please tell us that you're a virgin already so that the rest of us *adults* can move on."
Convincing argument you got there.
"Even worse is that it's under this rediculous impression of sex that you make decisions regarding abortion."
Since you never offered a refutation of his view of sex... your next statement (right above this sentence) is also invalid since, according to you, it is based on this that he bases his views on abortion.
"Two seperate sets of DNA, regardless of where they "meet" equal responsibility for both owners of DNA if a life is born."
Where they meet is not what is relevant. What is relevant is whose strands they are. Who owns said strands? Since they are both owned, and possessed by the woman, it is obviously hers.
"This is how we got the concept of marriage and the family with the parents at the head. This is how you get a fully functioning adult life that contributes to society."
There's a viable alternative that has been posted which is compatible with liberty.
"This is proven through society, science and culture."
It isn't proven through science. The fact that half the DNA comes from the man is irrelevant, since it is owned and possessed by the woman at the time of conception. It is the woman's property at this time, not the man's.
As for 'proof' coming from society and culture? This would only be 'proof' as near as I can tell if the consensus by society as to what is politically correct equated to truth, which doesn't, necessarilly.
A simple example for you: it can be held as the general consensus of society that 2+2=5, but this obviously does not make it so. Likewise, your argument that society and culture dicatates it (if this is what you were trying to say), and that it is therefore truth, is composed of fail for the same reason(s).
"Anonymous, how dare you try to deny this?"
Yeah anonymous, how dare you hold views that run contrary to what is generally percieved as correct by culture and society?