>>332
"Otherwise we would have to ban menstruations too."
We've been over this already. There is a huge difference between an egg, a sperm, an embryo, and a developing human being (fetus). We wouldn't need to do anything about menstruations.
"Who feels the organs take form and pulse?"
Yes, human organs forming would be a huge step toward becoming 'human'.
"Human life is nothing compared to the sanctity of the mind and the magnificence of cerebral processing."
This is irrelevant. It doesn't matter what 'human life is compared to...blah' whatever human life is, it is the proper function of good government to defend it. The only room for debate lies in the question 'when does life begin'. At that point, that life gets government protection, period.
"There is no life without a unique persona that can experience the existence."
I disagree.
"I think that a sensible society makes sure that people are aware and comfortable with the most fundamental part of their persona."
Sensible societies don't extort money from their neighbors at the point of government guns and bayonets for programs which are of debatable value. The proper function of government is to defend life, liberty, and property. If, for whatever reason, pro-lifers have moral qualms with these programs, as they aren't necessary for the furtherance of life, liberty, and property rights, it is not within the functions of a good government to have these programs. This isn't to say said programs wouldn't exist - they would just be handled by the private sector.
"I wouldn't want my daughter to date a boy without any idea of gender equality who thinks that sex is 'filthy-dirty'."
Were you talking about your daughter, or the boy?
If you were talking about your daughter, then send her to a private school so she gets a superior education, or you can always educate her yourself.
And if you were talking about the boy...
It isn't right for you to determine what ideas are acceptable for others to hold. The boy should be allowed to view sex as a filthy activity if he wants.
"It has not been the governments job so far, and the free market is very free in America already (it is not free enough)."
I agree. The liberals won't help here. Support the libertarians, if you really want this end, since they are the only party that supports it as well. The market in the USA is only 'free' relative to other nations and countries of the world. We are far, far from being 'libertarian', though we once were.. more or less. Right now, the USA is a mixed economy at best, and a socialist economy at worst.
"A mixture of abortions, ethical and unethical, are more acceptable than no abortions at all."
I guess this is where we disagree then. If I had the choice of all abortions allowed or none, I'd take none in a heartbeat. It isn't right to penalize the human fetuses involved in unethical abortions - sacrificing their right to live for the sake of allowing some other abortions that could have been prevented cheaply and easilly had certain preventative measures been taken.