>>270
"LOL. I know that you stupid fucking teenager. That's because what I'm saying is backed by science and you are 100% wrong in your assertion."
You aren't backed by science. You have scientific facts, but you are drawing conclusions with those scientific facts that are wrong. Your facts are right, your conclusions aren't. Just because you have perfect facts, doesn't mean the conclusions YOU draw with them will be right.
"And again, you're continuing to downplay this little factiod as "irrelevant" out of convience for your own foolish idealism, which is all well and good if this shit could be applied in reality. Ah! But it can't so that's an automatic lose, right there."
There is no reason it couldn't be applied to reality. All you need to do is dump child support laws. Society existed for a long time with no child support laws, and we got along fine.
"It's not ONLY that both are nessacary for creation it's (and pay attention) that BOTH ARE NESSACARY FOR THE MAINTIANCE AND UPBRINGING OF THE CHILD."
Again, completely irrelevant. I don't agree that it is necessary, in the first place, as I know plenty of children who grew up with only one, or no parents (some living with their grandparent(s) and they turned out fine, all of them.
"Do you understand that yet, you unwanted psychopathic piece of shit?"
Firstly, I'm not unwanted. I have a loving family, and plenty of friends. Secondly, the fact that your arguments are so emotionally-driven is showing through now.
"This is where man's responsibility comes in. If you had parents, you'd know this."
I have parents, and a normal family.