Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Defend the 2nd Amendment!

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-05 20:36

http://www.gunowners.org/

Defend your rights! Sign up for GOA Legislative Alerts and alert yourself to what the politicians want to do to your 2nd Amendment freedoms!

Quite possibly the best organization around for defense of your 2nd Amendment liberties, this site has a listing of your Senators and Congressman dating back to the Clinton Administration, and includes individual votes from every representative on many if not all gun-related votes within this span of time!

Vote out anti-gun incumbents!


Remember, it's a right, not a privilege.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-14 22:19

>>59

Can you give me any sane reason to have an assault rifle?  Now, compare that to the danger that an assault rifle presents.  Simply keeping an assault rifle presents a danger to people.  Assault rifles are dangerous, and without a compelling reason for civilians to own them, they should not be allowed to be sold to civillians.

>>60

>>Gun proliferation is the answer to shootings.
That's like saying knife proliferation is the answer to knifings.  Nuke proliferation is the answer to nuclear war.  Jesus Christ, are you really that stupid?

>>62

>>Exactly, it won't get to that point because there are 200 million guns in circulation and no politican wants to risk his cranial-ocular cavity trying to start a coupe.

It won't get to that point because the Religious Right has figured out that it's so much easier to create tyranny by subtle means.  Spread talking points throughout the media, use debate tactics that bring everything down to emotional catch-phrases, use phrases like "Support the troops" and "Why do you hate America?" to silence any dissent, etc.  My point is that guns are useless against the tactics they are using to create tyranny.  And if you want to use guns to fight back, then the police and the army are ready and willing to stop you.  Weapons are obsolete as the method of protecting liberty, so I see no compelling reason for minimal gun control.

>>I agree that there should be some degree of gun control just like there is control over the chemicals needed to produce explosives, biologically hazardous microbes etc etc..

That's exactly the way I see the issue of gun control.  Guns are extremely dangerous tools, like chemicals that can be used to make explosives.  But guns do have legitimate purposes.  Obviously the police and armed forces need them, and I'm not against hunting.  But because these tools are so dangerous, they must be controlled.

>>67

>>Elect Bush, your children get mercury death. Elect Kerry, guns get attacked and crime goes up.

Elect Libertarians and get cancer because there aren't any standards as to what companies can do with their product and lie to the consumer about.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List