Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Americans Use Firearms to Restore Law!

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-03 21:11

To all those who say that firearms rights will not protect citizens from an abusive government, I should cite the story of Athens, Tennessee. 

In a few small American counties in 1946...

http://www.jpfo.org/athens.htm

The folks at Athens would have made the Framers proud. 

Don't forget it!

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 2:53

>>41
No it doesn't. 

http://www.innocentsbetrayed.com/

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 5:13

>>40
Ironically it's civilians who have better guns. Military rifles are shit made by cheapest bidder. Compared to just about any quality civilian rifle they lose. Military has significant advance in training and heavy weaponry though, although those heavy weapons have not much use in almost entirely infantry based war that revulution would be.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 6:31

>>43

M4's aren`t available to civvies.  Those things will quiet any dissenting populous, especially when equipped with a M203.  Err.... wait, this ain`t /k/...

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 8:59

>>44
Only advantage of M4 over AR15 is full auto fire. Grenade launchers(new ones) are available for civvies willing to go through NFA paperwork. Also 37mm launchers are classed as non-firearms.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 11:03

Funny how socialists are always on about the revolution, how they are fighting the system and hence are not part of the government, yet they want to disarm the civilian population. More double standards and hypocrasy for you.

Name: Xel 2006-07-10 11:30

>>46 The right wants people to be safe from the government, and to stake a claim on their own and not be prosecuted for owning guns. OK, fine by me. If you happen to smoke pot or get into people of the same sex, now THAT'S a different ball game sonny jim! Anti-Gay crime is now on the rise again, which is the second reason I vote left in the US; the primary reason is that they're better for the economy, and the second is that I value  the safety of my gay fellow citizens more than I value religion, cheap wares and/or amusingly expensive boomsticks.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 14:51

>>47
Dude, I'm gay and I say please vote Libertarian. I'm not probably only one who thinks like that either. Both democraps and republicans aren't worth of voting. Besides there's Pink Pistols and many gays have been very succesfully using guns to defend themselves. You want to take that right away? Gun bans make gay crimes only worse.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 16:30

>>45

Auto fire, and that unless you've been properly cleaning that AR15, you're risking a slamfire.  Mostly, what you'd have to worry about there are civilians who most likely already had a military backing anyway.  At least with the M4, all you really have to worry about is burning the fuck out of your hands in burst or auto mode.

Name: Xel 2006-07-10 17:58

>>48 A point. This factor will now be taken into consideration in the future, I promise you that.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 19:47

>>45
Yup.  And, not only that, full-auto weapons are availible currently as well.  These people who think civs can't equip themselves for battle with LEGAL arms are just stupid.  Anyone with a couple hundred bux to spare can get the necessary paperwork done. 

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 20:28

>>51
Full-auto was restricted quite badly by 1986 ban. Civilians can't get full autos made after 1986 which has lead to extreme prices. Ironically you can buy new 20mm vulcan, since destructive device overrides full auto classification...

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 20:30

>>49
With M4 you have to worry about range as barrel is ridiculously short. Good for indoors, but bad when you wan to hit something that's not near.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 0:06

>>52
What the fuck? I thought you could get full auto if you just got the permit, the write off from your sherriff, etc?

And organizations are still making full autos that (I thought at least) were civvy legal, so why can't we buy them?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 0:09

>>54
Yes you can get, but it has to be pre 86 made. That's why they're so damn expensive.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 2:02

>>53

I`m not in the military, but don`t those things come with scopes?  What would be the point of scopes if they were so inaccurate?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 4:38

>>55
Those piece of shit politicians, god dammit. 

http://www.ak-103.com/rifles.html

What about that website, then? Can't buy from him? It LOOKS like he's selling... what's the deal?  ... are you 100% sure?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 5:31

Hurr hurr, the government is protecting itself against its people by restricting their firepower.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 5:34

>>58
Wow it's another smartass liberal. 

You love big-government? Love gun bans & gun control? >>>China asap.  Enjoy your Socialism.

Name: Xel 2006-07-11 5:57

>>59 Is the entire universe black/white or blue/red to you? You're so fucking... hetero.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 9:56

>>60
I'm gay and I 100% agree with him. I understood you had nothing against guns and you actually hated big goverment?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 9:58

>>57
Those are semi-auto. Rifles on NFA page are full-auto, but they sell them only to law enforcement.

Name: Xel 2006-07-11 11:01

>>61 I wasn't saying that it was a heterosexual standpoint, I just think the silly, diametrical tone of his post would have warrantedit to be called 'gay' by some, and I try to put the balance back by saying a thing is hetero where others would call it gay. As in: Overpriced shoes are totally hetero.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-12 0:05

Some of the rifles there are automatic.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-12 23:43

>>62
So I should go around committing hate crimes on white people to make up for all the hate crimes committed on black people?

Name: Xel 2006-07-13 1:18

>>64 Um, noo...

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 1:19

>>64
Maybe you should commit hate crimes against those who commited a hate crime.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 6:49

>>65
So why should you make bigotted remarks about heterosexuals? Saying something is "hetero" in a negative way is just as bad as saying something is "gay" in a negative way. 

Saying either just stirs up conflict, and is not good. 

Many black people tend to hate white people now because of a few racist white people.  If you start saying something is "hetero" I don't think it will lead anywhere good. 

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 7:37

>>66
Can't fight fire with fire.
>>67
Exactly.

Name: Xel 2006-07-13 10:08

>>67 >>68 Well, I wanted to show how silly and detrimental it is to call a bad thing "gay". If enough people say it, people will go "whoa" and start to think. I just try to prevent "gay" in a detrimental sense to become second nature for some.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 11:53

>>69
gays don't do what their supposed to (fuck women have children) and the word is thus appropriate as per usage as a derogatary term.

Name: Xel 2006-07-13 12:36

>>70 If you mean that then fail for hopeless stupidity. If you don't then fail for being a poor troll.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 20:33

>>69 That's not a good way to do it. 

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 21:54

>>69
It's this kind of attitude that turns me off from the equality movement. 

What I'm referring to, is basically reverse discrimination.  It manifests it's ugly head in the form of reparations as well. 

I'm for equal rights under the law for all, period.  I'm not for reverse discrimination. 

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 23:26

>>73
True, I'm gay and I agree with you. I'm all for gay rights ofcourse, but I find sad that some resort to ways of bigots in order to "promote" them. There is no positive discrimination.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-16 22:26

>>73
Exactly, and, in the case of reparations, you have to keep in mind that immigrants who move here (and there are LOTS of them) who earn money and will get taxed will have to pay these reparations that they all too likely had NOTHING whatever to do with, by ancestry or direct connection. 

Anyways, punishing people for something their ancestors did is stupid. 
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -