>>2
This issue hasn't been hammered down near enough... what is wrong with this post?
>>3
Not only are you naive, you need to realize this simple truth: not all "right wingers," "conservatives," "libertarians," or "minimalists" are the same. For example: You automatically seemed to assume that I support Dick Cheney, and that I am a neo-con. Wake up, you are prejudice. Not against black people, but against conservatives. You have already prejudged me based on nothing but that first article posted.
"I'm sick of all you neo-cons and Ayn Rand dicksuckers trying to make it look like the only way anyone can ever acheve anything is in an utterly lawless state, where you're free to abuse the rights of other people as you see fit. "
The only people abusing anyone's rights is the government. Business dealings are voluntary. Government taxation is not.
"trying to make it look like the only way anyone can ever acheve anything is in an utterly lawless state"
I don't advocate anarchy. Government is evil, but it is a necessary evil. Thus it should be restricted and limmited as much as is reasonably possible while still allowing people to live their lives in freedom, and preserving this relatively free state.