>>8
Look, Evolution is a great theory. It works great for micorEvolution. This means how a the bears cats and dogs come from the same family. Even how reptiles and birds are related. Even how a monkey becomes a person. Where it failes is that these can all be seen to have taken little steps. How does a single celled organism advance to a two celled organism to a three celled and so on in order to become a superadvanced life form such as a worm or a human being. I am not saying that Evolution is wrong and creationism correct. I don't believe in creationism myself. So there would be no point. All I am saying is that Pure Evolution has it's failures as well and you are putting your faith in a only partially developed theory. Taking what you see and puting your faith that the rest is there as well. It is really no different than someone just seeing the spots where it failes and throwing it all out. It is all relying on faith. You take comfort that they are wrong, just as they take comfort that you are wrong. No big deal. Athiests are not fuking realists. Anybody that insists that their view has all the proof and all the others are wrong in situations like this are stupid. Not the least problem is why does it mater. Does knowing that we are or aren't decendants of monkeys change where we are now? Than what is the point of the argument anyways. And really, What is the point of gettting the argument into politics? Does it help anyone to have this fight in politics.