So I watched
www.honestmediatoday.com/JDW.wmv and I really have to suspend disbelief at this piece of propoganda. Mentioning the Protocols of Zion as a valid source already discredits the film, as the Protocols were created by a communist author to increase anti-Jewish sentiment in Russia. All the "research" in the film is anecdotal opinion.
The letter that is claimed to be a forgery is a forgery simply because it has bad German writing, and therefore it "must be a forgery according to any German," without citing any sources from people who could study and verify this claim.
The "demolitions expert," a guy dressed in camo who doesn't want to have his face shown in this film, uses an elaborate test consisting of a hole dug with a spade and three phone books, ignited with a barbeque lighter and some flammable liquid. This is supposed to be a "professional test," but shows a lack of scientific rigor and budget.
The claim that the final solution was simply a plan to deport Jews to another country seems reasonable, but the extermination of Jews was done BECAUSE deportation was not feasible on such a massive scale. The final solution is the extermination of Jews. Yes, they were kept alive to continue working, but not forever. The claim that Jews were not starved by showing only a few pictures of healthy prisoners is misleading use of selective evidence, as there are many photos showing starving Jews, especially later when supplies would be low.
The gas chambers are said to require a gas extraction mechanism and be air tight, but the narrator shows no examples of this being used in other countries. The narrator also dismisses that a poisonous gas could be disperesed in to the air from chimneys and doors. In the US military a "gas chamber" is used with "CS gas" that causes choking, but the chamber is simply a building with doors. The gas does disperse outside with no problem, and at twenty feet from the building you can't detect the effects of this gas. Zyklon-B could very well be dispersed easily and harmlessly after leaving a room.
The main issue is using one piece of evidence to account for the entire WWII period, when conditions obviously change. It's entirely possible that prisoners were treated well at first, fed well, and kept alive at the start of concentration, but were fed less and allowed to starve as the war continued and supplies were limited. Mistreatment by the guards and malnourishment are both well documented.
The idea of cremating/incinerating bodies also assumes that all Jews were cremated consistently for the entire war period accounting for all 6 million, and is therefore impossible. The 5-6 million figure does not state that all 5-6 million were cremated. It includes deaths by starvation, typhus, and being shot directly by guards, which many were. Exactly how many were cremated is unknown.
The evidence that is troubling, assuming it has not been carefully hand picked by the filmmakers to support their claims while ignoring contrary evidence:
The lack of Zyklon-B staining the walls, assuming it leaves its blue residue after over 60 years.
The claims of the cremation expert, which seem reasonable. His mannerisms seem odd in the film, like he's reading questions from a screen. We don't get much information on who he is, and he seems reluctant to be interviewed.
The Holocaust survivor who makes claims about small pits burning thousands per day. While he doesn't seem to be lying, his claims can't be verified, and they still seem unrealistic. How does he know exactly how many were burned per day? It doesn't look like he's intentionally hiding something, but it looks like he's grossly exagerating.
The evidence of jews using unrealistic figures for death counts in the past. The several billion and million by the Romans, and the coincidental "6 million Holocaust" mentioned decades before, both implicate Jews as people who exagerate for their own cause.
The film lacks professional editing, lacks good professional evidence and research (no scientists conducting studies on physical evidence), and does use reputable outside sources who can verify claims, aside from one cremator. The viewer has to determine what is fact, what is selective evidence, and what is mere opinion based on the narrator's observations.
Like a video promoting claims on 9/11 or the Illuminati, this is mere propoganda meant to persuade you to believe everything they say without questioning their claims.