The important role of liberals.

Liberals whine all the time about everything and are either stupid and/or completely crazy, so you don't want them running the country.

However corrupt politicians often pay off people who criticise them to go somewhere else and liberals, being stupid and/or crazy, are very hard to pay off. Every man has his price, but if you get enough liberals whining away so the total expense of avoiding responsibility will be too high, there will be no way to escape justice for the corrupt politician or whoever is up to no good.

So you need liberals and you need enough of them to police a wide variety of issues in a heated paranoid manner. However the more liberals you have, the more influence they have over the government. So you need to find a balance between the corruption caused by liberals with their corrupt ideals and the corruption they alleviate through criticism.

I'm trying to make al ist of factors to understand how to control the proportion of liberals and how many and what type of liberals are needed. This is it briefly so far.
:the liberals' ability to criticise
;how crazy liberals are and how much money is needed to subvert them
;how much need there is for criticism ie. how much corruption there is
;how many people are in a position to commit the various crimes and how much money they have

The role of the media and action groups is a very important factor, since hierarchial groups are easier to bribe than an assorted movement. Michael Moore for instance makes a lot of money for not criticising certain companies and officials and the new york times is a liberal newpaper that occasionally expresses some avidly non-liberal points of view. It's obvious what is going on.

>>4
>>6
Ok I have to disagree. You don't have to be a liberal to not live in the real world, there are plenty of crazy people out there who are not liberals. Also some fascists share inherant traits with liberals and could be described as liberals. However I agree that there are more than 2 classifications, there are liberals and there are many different kinds of people whom are not liberal. I am merely focussing on liberal groups which pretty much exist in each country.

>>7
Left and right is a good approximation of politics in general. Through history the left has pushed for what they see as progress and the right have pushed for what they think needs to be preserved. The general idea is to have groups who argue over issues to determine what is the best course of action, eventually the government improved and there was universal suffrage and solutions to most of the problems faced by democratic governments, until eventually the liberals began to face unemployment. By the mid 70s there were no major issues to be resolved and liberals found there were no rational causes to fight for, but the same amount of liberals with the same dependance on blaming others and being radical out of boredom. This is where the problems with liberals began, before hand they would fight for rational ideas, but now that few things needed changing they decided to fight things that didn't need changing and fight for irrational ideas.

So when the liberal/government corruption ratio was low, liberals were useful and whe nthe liberal/government corruption ratio was high they acted like asses. Since the power liberals have is in proportion to their numbers and you don't want them in power, but you do want enough to criticise the government, it is obvious we need to control and preserve the liberal population.