Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Racial Responsibility? What the Fuck?

Name: Vrendi 2006-04-23 13:49

O.k., I am recapping off of my last thread and the other new threads dealing with such subjects [in euphemism] as the 'stereotypical universal B.O. of Arab peoples' and '"What If" Slavery of Blacks was Reinstated as a Legal Institution' and there seems to be some reoccuring themes in the [il]logic of those who argue for the supremacy/pride/nationalism/genocide/subjugation/etc. of various races on all sides...

 [...I've seen forums in which it has literally turned into a White vs. Black vs. Yellow debate in which the racist Whites accuse ALL Blacks of inferiority and universal problem-making, the racist Blacks accuse ALL Whites of universally instituted racism and holding them back and the racist Yellows accuse the Whites AND Blacks of genetically objective inferiority [see: Wikipedia article on 'Race and Intelligence'] and themselves of being the true superior peoples of humanity... Egh, at least to me, all of these people just seem likepeople needing a lesson in objectivity playing out old evolutionarily primate neuro-script under the guise of objectivity and 'intellectualism'...]

...of this conflict. One of these themes is the theory that because a person is of a certain skin color, they are instantly and undeniably universally responsible AND A PART OF the actions of other people of that same skin color, whether positive or negative. Some of the arguments I've seen from various people who spout this 'Racial Responsibility' as if it was as absolute and irrefutable as the loads of other ignorance they consider true are...

From Racist Whites = "We Anglo-Saxxons have practically carried the Western World, European AND American on our backs. Economic, Scientific, Philosophic, Literary... all us. We have the Magna Carta. Shakespeare. Quantum Physics, the Constitution... all of it. All these inferior races have... what? Nothing." Analysis: So, based upon this logic of ability based on race, you're able to  recite all of Shakespeare's sonnets and plays, explain the structure and significance of Iambic Pentameter, explain the full spectrum of mathematic, physical and theoretical principles surrounding quantum mechanics and apparently do anything that anyone who's white has ever done... AND YOU WERE THERE AT THE MAGNA CARTA, TOO? WOW!

From Racist Blacks = Usually there is a mentioning of how their musical traditions have been stolen by Whites. Everything from original tribal beats to original Rock&Roll to Raggae to Funk to House to Disco to Jazz has been co-opted... Unh-huh... Same analysis, write and perform a song of the genres mentioned here based upon your obvious ability to do so as a black person and THEN talk to me.

You get my point people.

Discuss... rationally, please.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-29 0:08


1. You ignored most of my essay.

2. Inductivity ensures that we can never have perfect certainty about any testable knowledge.

3. Yes, race has to be realized. It's not necessarily a choice to realize it, more like a choice to stop denying it. Race is a natural observation. Shared traits are easily recognizable.

For some alterior motive you are being disingenuous. It's easy to tell when your opinion of whites comes through.


---------------
So, according to your statement, it's alright that whites have a reputation for mass genocides, warmongering, ethinic cleansing, bigotry, etc? By calling this "revised white history" you're saying that I'm not indentifying the mechanism for the behaviors of whites. Why is wrong from me to not indentify the mechanisms for white, but right when you don't address or indentify the mechanisms for blacks? Why do you refuse to acknowledge the fact that no one- no human being wants to be treated based on generalities? Why do you continue to ignore the basic human need for affection? Given this acknowledgement- what do you think is going to eventually happen if your big seperatist race war prophecy comes true? Do you really think human history is going to look at your types as new frontier liberators? You're delusional.
--------------------

Your argument is thus:


defending white racial interest against invaders = nazis = genocide

What you have ignored is that 'race-replacing' whites throughout the world is genocide in itself. Politically correct genocide is genocide never the less.

Here's Bob's Mantra in case you haven't read it.

BOB'S MANTRA
"Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."


"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."


"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."


"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"


"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"


"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"


"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."


"They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white."


"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
 

Bob Whitaker


Obviously, you have no problems with mexicans encroaching upon white living space. You also have no problems with whites being raped, removed, displaced, and killed in South Africa and Zimbabwe.

The white people suffering in South Africa are suffering due to a government that embraces 'communism, diversity, and equality.' Apparently, diversity is a world which is without the only people that are not diverse, i.e. whites. Apparently equality means violent oppression of whites by non-whites.

Anti-racism means anti-white. Anti-whiteness carries the implicit definition of oppression of whites and their genocide.

You state more by what you implicitly don't talk about than what you do.

Ignoring race does not rid you of racial conflict. Racial conflict can only be avoided by limited separation, mutal respect, and non-aggression.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List