Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Racial Responsibility? What the Fuck?

Name: Vrendi 2006-04-23 13:49

O.k., I am recapping off of my last thread and the other new threads dealing with such subjects [in euphemism] as the 'stereotypical universal B.O. of Arab peoples' and '"What If" Slavery of Blacks was Reinstated as a Legal Institution' and there seems to be some reoccuring themes in the [il]logic of those who argue for the supremacy/pride/nationalism/genocide/subjugation/etc. of various races on all sides...

 [...I've seen forums in which it has literally turned into a White vs. Black vs. Yellow debate in which the racist Whites accuse ALL Blacks of inferiority and universal problem-making, the racist Blacks accuse ALL Whites of universally instituted racism and holding them back and the racist Yellows accuse the Whites AND Blacks of genetically objective inferiority [see: Wikipedia article on 'Race and Intelligence'] and themselves of being the true superior peoples of humanity... Egh, at least to me, all of these people just seem likepeople needing a lesson in objectivity playing out old evolutionarily primate neuro-script under the guise of objectivity and 'intellectualism'...]

...of this conflict. One of these themes is the theory that because a person is of a certain skin color, they are instantly and undeniably universally responsible AND A PART OF the actions of other people of that same skin color, whether positive or negative. Some of the arguments I've seen from various people who spout this 'Racial Responsibility' as if it was as absolute and irrefutable as the loads of other ignorance they consider true are...

From Racist Whites = "We Anglo-Saxxons have practically carried the Western World, European AND American on our backs. Economic, Scientific, Philosophic, Literary... all us. We have the Magna Carta. Shakespeare. Quantum Physics, the Constitution... all of it. All these inferior races have... what? Nothing." Analysis: So, based upon this logic of ability based on race, you're able to  recite all of Shakespeare's sonnets and plays, explain the structure and significance of Iambic Pentameter, explain the full spectrum of mathematic, physical and theoretical principles surrounding quantum mechanics and apparently do anything that anyone who's white has ever done... AND YOU WERE THERE AT THE MAGNA CARTA, TOO? WOW!

From Racist Blacks = Usually there is a mentioning of how their musical traditions have been stolen by Whites. Everything from original tribal beats to original Rock&Roll to Raggae to Funk to House to Disco to Jazz has been co-opted... Unh-huh... Same analysis, write and perform a song of the genres mentioned here based upon your obvious ability to do so as a black person and THEN talk to me.

You get my point people.

Discuss... rationally, please.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-28 0:24

1. Racism isn't a bad thing. It's a current taboo. What is racism? Racism means that you believe that races exist, races being the convergence of statistical data in observations to correlate to probabilities that certain traits will show up in a population group due to shared genetic, primarily, and cultural, secondarily, characteristics. These probabalities are actually closed to Bayesian, being that they are more like confidence that something will be a certain way rather than reflecting an actual 'real' probablity as is the case with quantum physics.

2. When you say racism, you seem to be using it inapproiately as a term that means, "white dominated interracial conflict."

Whites do not dominate every interracial conflict, and when they do they tend to be rather tame. The full-blown 'informal' genocide and removal of whites in Zimbabwe/Rhodesia and in South Africa seems to be a nice contrast.

http://www.africancrisis.org/default2.asp

Let's take the United States, for instance. Let's consider the immigration problem racially. Living space is a limited commodity; Japan illustrates this concept nicely. Right now, white living space in the United States is being threatened by an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants. In Europe, the white population is being threatened by a muslim population.

Throughout this conflict, whites standing up for white self-interest are being portrayed as immoral or villanous somehow, i.e. racist (a term that is silly as the much ballyhoo-ed anti-semetic.) Ones that stand up for anti-white activity are seen as progressive. No one questions the right of
these various non-white populations to encroach upon the territory of white populations.

To illustrate this let's take into account Bob's mantra:

BOB'S MANTRA
"Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."


"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."


"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."


"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"


"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"


"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"


"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."


"They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white."


"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
 

Bob Whitaker

http://www.whitakeronline.org/
----------------

This is the interesting part of this topic. Whites are 'suggested' in modern white cultures to not stand up for their own self interest. It's racial and cultural suicide on a massive scale.



My theories on who heads the propagation of this implicit anti-white attitude? It's a group that no one dares criticize. They are incredibly powerful within the economies and media of nearly every white country today; they somehow manage to get billions upon billions of dollars in free aid to a country that has little to do with the self-interest of the United States; they control the most powerful lobby in the United States; they implicitly direct the military and foreign policy of the United States; they regularly commit atrocities without mention; they attacked a military vessel of the United States with the intention to damage relations or start a war between the U.S. and Egypt; they practice a religion which preaches ethnic superiority and xenophobia; they have been repeatedly removed from countries after they 'overstayed' their welcome to the point of becoming destructive pests and refusing to assimilate; they have been remarked on negatively by some of the greatest figures in Western history.

"If you want to identify the real rulers of any society, simply ask yourself this question: Who is it that I cannot criticize?"

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List