>>8
A. So you admit that genes can control intelligence? Really your argument is making less and less sense by the minute.
B. I give them the benefit of the doubt because they aren't (at least overtly) dedicated to a special interest other than that of history itself. You notice how they speak highly about the acheivements of non african/europeans, it only stands to follow that they'd be LESS (though not neccesarily completely non) biased. Anyone interested in African studies is obviously biased TOWARD all things African, with an obvious agenda of advancing the black community.
>>Ha. Utterly Pathetic.
You aren't winning. Chimping out and acting like you are isn't helping your case.