>>16
And your point would be what? It's still fallacy. You don't have a special insight into the minds of these professors. Mind on telling us who these magical black professors are? Because you pretty much prefaced that statement with this one: "So, I guess I trust the "white" professors more."
Which says to me that you wouldn't even
look for a black professor out of the sheer fear that they would say something positive about the civilizations of Africa.
>>17
The only thing that's embarassing is that boner you get whenever your mom bends over.
Don't play the ad hominem game with me, son.
You will lose.
Oh by the way, while you were busy with character attacks you forgot to respond to this:
You know, it's funny. You expect people to take the Bell Curve seriously despite the fact that the Pioneer Fund has been connected to Nazi science and the fact that Pioneer Fund doesn't usually fund projects that have nothing to do with race.
You refuse to acknowledge their interest in spreading negative racial psuedo-scientific dogma and yet when it comes to WHITE MEN doing STUDIES ON AFRICA, you can't bring yourself to believe that they could be telling the truth because they aren't doing things to further whites in this racial heirarchy you believe in?
Haha, the very reason why it's so utterly pathetic is that motavation doesn't change "the truth". You will freely use this argument when referring to the bell curve; "just because they're nazis doesn't mean the science is bad".
Well, same applies to african studies, doesn't it?