>> 15 A
Genes can act as a limiting factor to intelligence, just like nurture can. On the converse, genes can also act as a booster to intelligence, even in adverse environments.
And with regard to how genes change over time, I don't think this was your original argument. The argument is whether genes control traits expressed, and you said that they don't. Now you're saying that genes change over time, and therefore that marks an influence of the environment... Ok, fine, given. But how does this refute anything I said about genes being a controlling factor for traits expressed? It almsot sounds like you're agreeing with me. This is what I meant when I said you don't understand your own argument.
>>17
Shut up. You're embarassing.