Abortion

I live in LA and right now, they are trying to pass a bill outlawing all abortions with the exception that it was cause by rape or incest and if it jeprodizes the mothers life.

Why is the government compromized mainly of white, old men who represent a small amount of the population. I don't think men should be able to make laws governing what a woman does with her body. I see early term abortions as getting rid of some very unwanted cells growing in ones body. What if I don't have the means of raising a child, what if I don't have the time to take away  from school to go through a few months of hell only to give up a child who makes me exponentially uglier and looser, what if I'm a crackwhore who would only make the child grow up the be fuck up and have a horrible, depressing life like all those /b/tards. I'm really scared that this law will be passed seeing how I live in a backwards, uber consevative state.

And also, North Caroline (maybe South I forget) is trying to pass a bill to ban all abortions that don't jeprodize the mothers lifes. WTF?

>>155

NO. Wrong again Mr. Dumb Opinion! Stop "paraphrasing"- all you're doing is trying to distill down the mountain sized nugget of truth you refuse to address. It is a statistical *fact* that orphans very rarely become productive members of society. This includes children who's mothers decided to have them- father figure be damned.

It's sick and twisted that you SELFISHLY want these children to live to kill, rob and death-suckle other members of society to satisfy *your* need to feel like you're "Defending the innocents". Your ideals are flimsy and only half of a philsophy. If you're against evil, death, and the callous destruction of innocence then you should unilaterally against it. You should replace talk with action. IF you really care about children, you would be adopting all these unwanted kids. It's clear to any reasonable human being that in light of your willingness to explain away this ethical truth- you care more about seeing your ideals win out over everyone else's than you do about the subject itself- INNOCENT CHILDREN.

Practice what you preach, son. Otherwise: Why should any one listen to you and what you have to say?

And the people against against casual sex? All I have to say is that the proponent of this argument made the orgasm analogous to a spell from a fucking Square RPG game! Come the fuck on, guys. "HASTE"? Aging from an orgasm? HAHAHA- that's the gayest nerd shit I've heard since the fag-furry movement.