Attention White People

I heard about this site from one of my ‘white’ friends and am absolutely horrified by you little fucking crackers. Where do you fuckers think you can get off thinking that we are dumb shits? Horrible pictures. We’re not dumb niggers. The list of stupid white folks goes on forever. George Bush? You racists!

A few things you white-folk need to be aware of… mainly cause I’m not wasting much more time here.
One: Nigger is not your word to use to describe us. And I’ve never once called one my homies Nigger. Its Nigga, There’s a difference.
Two: You’re afraid that we’re more successful then you white people. This posturing bullshit about wanting to kill us off is just more of your typical white trash!
Third: My dick is bigger then yours. Its true.

Lets be honest here there are so many wanna be whites trying to be black. Deep in side you all want to be like us. You’re jealous of our culture. Our women are hotter then your ugly ass white girls. And you cannot stop our growing dominance as a group of people in society. You ARE ALL White Trash!

Around blacks never relaxes? Fuck you whites. Around the white, nothing seems right!

>>1->>80
Stop smoking that crack.

lol "race wars" like in starcraft

>>8 was fucking right.

>>83
TRUTH

>>82
ya let's zurg rush b4 closedown.

KEKEKE ZERG RUSH

>>1
Nigger!

This is so retarded it's smart.

>>87
This is so smart it's retarded

One: Nigger is not your word to use to describe us. And I’ve never once called one my homies Nigger. Its Nigga, There’s a difference.

Yeah there is a difference. A 'Nigga' Is a doubley retarded and socially dispicable Nigger.

What an Idiot. The only Black people i respect are those that arent part of that 'Nigga' Culture that is seemingly embodies the pinnicale of Black 'art, culture and civilisation'.

The negroes and their crulety towards others are held up as a model for humanity. But they are really a crossbreed bettwen human and animal. Fucking negro beasts

>>90
whitey dun enslavery

......__
...../\_\
..../ / /_
.../ /_/\ \
.._\ \/ \ \
./\ \ /\ \_\
.\ \/ \ \/_/
..\ /\ \_\
...\/_/ / /
...../ / /
.....\/_/ VOTE NSM AS CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT IN 2008

And people wonder why I hate all races equally.

Nazi images and symbols are used by people who want to discredit people that genuinely support the rights of indigenious white people to live in their own countries without threat from extensive immigration or foreign influence or the restriction or removal of rights of white people (specifically targeted) as a people (or as individuals) in their homelands.

In other words they want to project the image that:

If I stand up for white people, in or from various countries, as having equal rights to people in other countries as indigenous peoples, you're a nazithatwantstokillsixmillionjews.

The Swastika is a religious symbol, bastardised by the Nazis because they were 'purifying the world'. I don't hate you because you're black, I hate you because you're a twat.

>>96
The nazis didnt fuck it up. Its was the jews and the anit nazi after the war.

I'm not a nazi, but I want to kill six million jews. Why do liberals love me?

>>100
fag

King Faggious of the Fag Fagger continuum reporting for political asylum from a time warp.

>>100
You fail at 100GET

>>98
Because they all fucking fail

>>94


Whites aren't indigenious to America.

>>103

indigenous - living naturally in a particular region or environment.

Yes they are. They have a colony there, and they've been living there for hundreds of years, natively. How many centuries do have to live in an area, before you become a native? If you really want to say that white people aren't natives, then you could really say that human beings are only 'indigenous' to Africa. Mexican people haven't lived here for hundreds of years, my people have, and they claim this land to be theirs. As I understand it, my parents, their parents, their grandparents, their greatgrandparents, and their great great grandparents, and their great great great great great grandparents lived here. More than 15 generations in fact. So, if a people is not indigenous to an area after 15 generations, then who is?

Raptor Jesus

>>104
http://www.nativeamericans.com/
native americans

What gives a people the right to its territory -- "being there first" or doing whatever is necessary to secure it?

by H. Millard

SOME OF THE supporters of illegal aliens are carrying signs at rallies that repeat the old saw that illegal aliens from points south and especially Mexico (being "bronze people" don't you know, and thus related to Native Americans), are the real owners of North America.

It's a play on the tired cliché about the U.S. being a nation of immigrants, and maintains that unless you're a Native American, Bunky, you're just a friggin' immigrant and you've got no business trying to kick out the bronze people, who, as cousins of the red people, own the damn place and are thus not illegal immigrants, but you damn White people, well... you gotta go. Ho hum. Yawn.

Without belaboring this silliness too much, consider that every friggin' nation on the damn planet has seen the ebb and flow of peoples. We've all got legs and feet, and we walk all over the damn place whenever we get crowded or hungry or see that someone else has something we want. All nations are nations of immigrants. So what? That doesn't mean that the people in any nation at any given time can't have borders and can't enforce immigration laws. They derive this right from being the possessors of the land at the time they do these things.

Nature has a whole bunch of laws that one doesn't have to write down. They just are. One of those laws is that nature abhors a vacuum. And this not only applies to why water just naturally flows into an empty chamber, it also applies to why people move about the planet.

If a people living in a desirable land does not fully populate its land or doesn't successfully maintain its sovereignty and protect its borders, then it should expect others to flow in to populate the land and to take advantage of those desirable conditions.

The Native Americans failed to populate what is now the United States and they failed to maintain its sovereignty. Europeans flowed in because this was a less crowded land and it was more comfortable for our European ancestors than Europe at that time. Also the Native Americans seem to have had elite leaders who were as goofy as our present day elite leaders. They left the damn door open, and we came in and then forced them out. We were doing work the Native Americans wouldn't do.

That's just the way it works throughout nature. All life seeks to be where it is comfortable and will try to flow to where it is, indeed, most comfortable.

Even flatworms in a Petri dish will "immigrate" to the part of the dish that is most comfortable for them. If other flatworms are already there, then something has to give because two objects can't occupy the same space. Eventually, the once comfortable part of the Petri dish is no longer comfortable either for the ones that were there first or for the new arrivals. Think United States with a population of about 300 million and then add in many millions more illegal aliens.

Who, in a cosmic sense, has the right to that better spot in the Petri dish? Do the flatworms who were there first have that right, just because they were first, or do the ones who are willing to struggle the most to be there -- whether they were there first or not -- have that right? Ponder.

And, while you're pondering, consider that the basic principles about who has the right to something can be made clearer when we put it in the context of sports. Who has the right to win the prize or the trophy? It's the one who wins it. If one side doesn't win or just gives up, then the other side has the right to the prize. It's the same with nations.

In the U.S. today, we're seeing the elites giving up and allowing our land to be taken over. Of course, the elites aren't really giving up something they want. They're giving up what the average Americans want. Most of the elites aren't really Americans. They're internationalists who simply are staying in the U.S. Oh, they'll wave the flag and pretend they're patriots, but most really aren't. They really see themselves as citizens of the world. Average Americans, on the other hand, are usually not internationalists or citizens of the world. Foreign nations really are foreign to most Americans; they're not places where one has another home or places where one can run if things get tough in the U.S. The elites are giving away America -- which was built by average American citizens to be a comfortable place. The elites are simply discarding average Americans. And, yes, the chief discarder is President Bush.

The elites benefit from cheap labor and easy votes and they're insulated from the hoi polloi (you and I) by living in mansions or on well-guarded ranches where they can pretend they're cowboys. That's not the way it is for average blue collar and middle class U.S. citizens. We're the ones who are getting the shaft. We're the ones who send our kids to public schools that are failing. We're the ones who face the crime on our streets because of illegal aliens. We're the ones who see our neighborhoods falling apart because of illegal aliens. We're the ones who have problems with getting medical care because emergency rooms are closing because of illegal aliens. We're the ones who are getting screwed.

In other words, it can be argued that illegal aliens are doing to us what we did to the Native Americans and what the Native Americans did to the people who were here before them and so on down through the ages -- they're simply moving to where it's more comfortable for them. Of course, what's happening is that they're making the nation less comfortable for us.

There's no moral right or wrong, in a cosmic sense, in this. It just depends on whether you're on the giving or receiving end of things and whether you're willing to secure and keep the comfortable spot in the Petri dish or wimp out (as our so-called leaders are doing) and let others take that comfortable spot.

To the elites, it doesn't matter if average Americas are screwed. They say: Hell, average Americans ask too much for their labor and they're uppity enough to want medical and other benefits.

Screw them, is the attitude of the elites. The elites see people as machines made of flesh and blood to be used to produce wealth for the elites. If you can find a cheaper flesh and blood machine -- illegal aliens, for example -- there's more wealth for the elites.

But, there's another twist to this business of "first-one-in-owns-the-place" stuff. Native Americans may not have preceded Europeans in North America after all. There are many reports of Europeans being here first.

One interesting case that I wrote about several years ago concerns the so-called Kennewick Man. Here's a version of that column:


    STARLOG: REMAINS FOUND OF STARSHIP CAPTAIN BEAMED DOWN TO PRIMITIVE PLANET 9,000 YEARS AGO -- BURY HIM FAST BEFORE ANYONE CATCHES ON

    SOME YEARS ago, some obviously ancient bones were found near Kennewick in Washington State. At first, scientists thought they were the bones of a Native American. Then, after a closer look, they realized that bones appeared to be those of a European.

    The problem was that the bones were of a man who had died 9,000 years ago (about 7,000 B. C.). Not only should there not have been any Europeans in the area at that time, but this was also 6,000 years before any Native Americans were supposed to be there.

    The Kennewick Man story is one of those inconvenient things that pop up every so often that cut the legs out from under various PC dogmatic "truths."

    Suddenly, some Native Americans who had been claiming a moral high ground, based on a claim that they were the first people in North America, had a rival.

    While scientists wanted to conduct more studies of the bones, Native Americans demanded that the bones not be studied and that they be handed over to the Native Americans for burial. The scientists disagreed and the matter went through the courts.

    Sometime ago, the court said the scientists could study the bones. At last report that's what they were doing. Whether or not the Kennewick Man eventually turns out to have been European or not is not the point of this column -- there are many other similar cases that might give Europeans such a claim on North America. The point is that people move from one area to another all the time.

    An interesting thing about the Kennewick Man is that the reconstruction of his head, done from his skull, bears a striking resemblance to the actor Patrick Stewart who plays Captain Picard of the Starship Enterprise. In fact, the resemblance is so strong that one is hard pressed to tell one from the other.

    Perhaps we need to look at Stewart's family tree to see if one of his ancestors disappeared from Europe while he was out fishing in his boat one day about 9,000 years ago.

    If some are going to push the notion that "the first one in gets the land" or has the moral high ground, then Kennewick Man or some similar individual may have established a claim on North America -- and the Native Americans may be claim jumpers.

The 9,000-year-old remains of what may be a White man found in Kennewick, Washington in 1996 are -- finally -- to be exhaustively examined by scientists. The remains have been in limbo for the last seven years as the court system has deliberated on their ownership. American Indians, using the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, had claimed Kennewick man as a distant ancestor and had tried to forbid further studies. An initial examination suggested the ancient man was racially European. (illustration: a scientific reconstruction of Kennewick Man's features)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3460773.stm

New Research Shows Welsh In Early America

Since the widespread interest in Kennewick Man in the late 1990s, the days of the establishment's 'received history' of the pre-1492 populations of the New World have been numbered. The old-line theory of Bering Strait Asiatic migration to the Americas as the only source of pre-Columbian settlement is dying in the face of DNA evidence -- as well as the de-legitimization of the PC "academy" as a result of the Internet.

Kennewick Man was genetically unlike Western American Indians, and his skull was so "White"-like that murder investigators were called in, until the cause of death was determined to be a Stone Age arrow head.

Interestingly, the arrow was proved to be an artifact of the so-called "Clovis" culture, whose practitioners were indeed Asiatics. So the Europid-related Kennewick Man is the oldest known victim of American inter-ethnic conflict; a Stone Age -- White -- "hate crime" victim! A generation of Whites who suffered multicult sermons in college are avenged!

Now two unconventional researchers in the UK have uncovered evidence of early Welsh settlement in the eastern United States. The researchers -- an Englishman and Welshman -- have already tweaked English academic historical prejudices in resurrecting Welsh (Cymric) sources dealing with the so-called Dark Ages, and their latest iconoclastic findings are set to shake-up the New World establishment also:

"Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett, leading experts on King Arthur who have published 5 books on ancient Welsh history, say that Madoc Morfran - a prince from the south of Wales - sailed to the New World in 562AD. What's more, they say that Madoc made his journey after a comet hit the Earth during the 500s, which caused widespread famine and disease.

"The new claim disputes the academic theory which says another Madoc, the son of Owen Gwynedd, sailed to North America in 1170. Wilson and Blackett cite British-style hill forts found in Ohio as evidence of the journey - and also say that Welsh became integrated into some Native American languages.

"There are old-style Welsh hill forts around the Ohio River valley that are patterned as they are in Britain,' Mr Wilson said. 'They have a lot of inscriptions out there, carved in caves and on artifacts which are in coelbren, the old Welsh alphabet mainly recorded in South-East Wales.'

"Other evidence includes Caucasian-like skeletons near Ohio, which seem to verify Native American tales of a race of white men arriving in America at the time."

The authors had also, in 2002, publicly challenged Jewish film producer Steven Spielberg to make a film based on their research into the life of the real King Arthur. That challenge was not taken up by Spielberg.

IcWales on Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett

Genes Trace the Ancient Wanderings of White People

DNA testing reveals the secrets of history.

by Steven E. Romer

WE NOW know that the first Americans were Europeans, and that Vikings came here too. I think somehow that the original mix of people (the early Whites who disappeared and who left genetic traces in some tribes of later Amerindians) screws up the interpretation of some of the data on the new racial DNA tests -- reporting some definite Europeans as having "native American" genes. Some of the genes of Europeans may have been left behind, upsetting the norming used to define "Native American."

See the Discovery Channel special available on DVD, "Ice Age Columbus, who were the first Americans?"

As you watch the film, remember also the well-known 9,000-year-old Caucasian bones known as "Kennewick Man" found here in the U.S. near Kennewick, Washington. Scientists also have found Caucasian skeletons near Mexico City from 11,000 years ago. The ages of these finds predate the remains found of the Asian and Amerindian types who were the ancestors of those known as Indians, Amerindians, or "Native Americans" today.

Also suggestive of a much wider range for our race in prehistoric times are the frozen 4,000- to 5,000-year-old mummies of Urumchi in northeastern China, which are clearly European.

This month, believe it or not, the Discovery Channel will be telling us about "The Riddle of the Desert Mummies": "The most amazing thing about 4,000-year-old mummies discovered in the Chinese desert is that they were not Asian, but Caucasian. DNA analysis is helping scientists piece together the mystery of these fair-haired people in the heart of Asia."

The program will air this month: JAN 15 2006 @ 07:00 PM; JAN 16 2006 @ 03:00 AM; and JAN 16 2006 @ 11:00 AM. There is no DVD for this show available that I know of, so record this one if you can.

And there are the still-mysterious Alaskan mummies found in the Aleutian Islands -- the only mummies ever found in North America.

These are pretty close geographically to the Chinese mummies, but Amerindians are litigating to have these remains quickly re-buried -- just like they did with Kennewick man (since they are motivated not by the quest for truth, but by other things) -- saying they are "sacred ancestors," but not wanting us to test the bones to be sure.

There was racial mixing in ancient North America. Apparently the European presence was, tragically, not large enough to be independent and viable. You can follow our ancestors' journey across Asia and across the Atlantic to the east coast of North America. It is entirely possible that Asians came here as "sherpas" with the European explorers, since we know that Asians are not really the explorer-type (as evidenced by their lack of this sort of activity and even their Great Wall). They do not climb mountains "because they are there" as Sir Edmund Hillary so cryptically (and genetically?) said.

Some clearly European people have tested as having "Native American" genes on their genetic tests. This ancient story may be why. DNA Print Genomics has shown this pattern in particular on some tests where the testee knows he is fully European. Lots of these designations are statistical. Because of what are called "confidence intervals" you must be careful about accepting low levels of admixture as authoritative. For example, if you show just 5% sub-Saharan African, then you may actually have zero sub-Saharan ancestry. With the "Native American" designation, you could be all European with higher "Native American" readings than shown, for the reasons I state. Also, we do not know the populations they are norming this stuff on. Many "Indians" are mixed-race. "Mestizo" means mixed.

The Genographic Project also looks interesting. They're attempting to trace the ancient movements of people -- and DNA -- around the globe. This project may yield more important info than the space program or any other science. Beautiful thing. We must participate.

Another worthwhile company is Ancestry by DNA (ABD).

At the top right of this article is a graph from my results at ABD, and to the left is my graph from the Genographic Project. As science advances, it will help us understand our true heritage. The truth must be known. Follow the links here; some companies resell these services as brokers for twice the price these days. Go direct.

Ungrateful negroes. If the slave trade never ocurred, where would darkies be today. Of course in blackfrica preparing their weekly meal of some type rodent. Of course since the life expectancy of blackfrica is lowest worldwide, not many mals to make or miss.

Heil Hitler

Kraus

Buh-hoe!

The NSM is getting bigger
Thank god I'm not a nigger

NSM?  C'mon now.  Pull that shit in Detroit.

Without whites, you'd be a castrated slave to the arabs living in a medieval tyranny.

>>115
Truth

>>3
>>1

Now, seriously, what fucking need to be superior. I have my live, I am white (or hispanic or whatever you want to call it, I'm from the south of Spain and blood here is more of a medley than anything) and I couldn't care less if any other ethnia is "better" than mine:

First, ¿how could it be "better" (or worse for that matter) than mine?

Second, erasing it from the planet's surface, ¿how could make my ethnia better?

Third: If there was a better ethnia around, that wouldn't make mine worse, it just makes a comparison possible. Same applies for worse ethnias making mine better.

Fourth: Effects of exterminating an ethnia, let's use black people for the example: Blacks have bigger dicks. Porn actors usually have bigger dicks than regular people too. Exterminating porn actors won't make my dick bigger. So exterminating blacks won't make it bigger either.

Fifth: The "They steal our jobs!!" argument. Companies seek to earn the biggest profit possible. If someone else worked as cheap as illegal immigrants, they would hire them. Would then racists shift to want to kill those people? The root of the problem isn't that illegal immigrants work for too heap, it's that companies will hire the cheapest workers regardless of other considerations.

Sixth: Aesthetics and purity considerations are subjective, and the fact is that mixed heritage persons usually inherit the best of their parents.

-Psiweapon

>>1
WTF?  Are you retarded?  White women are THE standard of beauty for the entire world.  And black women; they're just fucking nasty.  Black women have disgusting proportions and have a greater tendancy to be fat than any other race, except maybe latinos.  In addition to that black women are notorious for having piss poor "oh no you didn't" attitudes about everthing from personal relationships to work.

I've have seen, on a few occasions, some physically attractive black girls.  But they're pretty damn rare.  And even if they are pretty, they usually take the same ignorant attitude that many other black girls have.

There are a lot of hot black men.

Black women... not as many. It's probably less to do with their bodies and more to do with their stupidity.

Blame it on their braindead culture.

>>119
Condoleeza Rice is hawt.