Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Attention White People

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-15 23:52

I heard about this site from one of my ‘white’ friends and am absolutely horrified by you little fucking crackers. Where do you fuckers think you can get off thinking that we are dumb shits? Horrible pictures. We’re not dumb niggers. The list of stupid white folks goes on forever. George Bush? You racists!

A few things you white-folk need to be aware of… mainly cause I’m not wasting much more time here.
One: Nigger is not your word to use to describe us. And I’ve never once called one my homies Nigger. Its Nigga, There’s a difference.
Two: You’re afraid that we’re more successful then you white people. This posturing bullshit about wanting to kill us off is just more of your typical white trash!
Third: My dick is bigger then yours. Its true.

Lets be honest here there are so many wanna be whites trying to be black. Deep in side you all want to be like us. You’re jealous of our culture. Our women are hotter then your ugly ass white girls. And you cannot stop our growing dominance as a group of people in society. You ARE ALL White Trash!

Around blacks never relaxes? Fuck you whites. Around the white, nothing seems right!

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-09 11:50

Blacks are good at gospel singing and natural rythm. They got big penises to, but thats about it...

Name: Xel 2006-07-09 14:42

>>202 In fact they are no more hung on average than us gauls, anglicans w/ever. Their dark color gives them a more uniform skin nuance, however, which is enviable for a Swede like me, who is so pale I sometimes shift into purple. That thing with the butts I won't go in to, but I'm one of those common unrefined tit-guys anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 12:44

Name: Xel 2006-07-10 14:35

>>207 It's all environmental determinism. A few generations with switched living conditions and we'd see switched statistics. I'm not the type of person to scream racism the minute I hear arguments against affirmative action or eugenics studies, because I know where to draw the line. Using the n-bomb, scary pictures and not backing stuff up while generalizing is below me. That link is kind of fun though, nothing more.

Name: Xel 2006-07-10 23:23

I have accepted a cock up the ass, he was black and had aids and I wanted to prove I was tolerant. I'm not even a homosexual, but I wish I was.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 2:50

>>208

"Eugenics Studies" does, in fact, fall into the "Environmental Determinism" category.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 2:56

>>208
Both the environment and genes are factors. Evolution occurs and has influenced the mental and physical performances of different races and people.

Name: Xel 2006-07-11 3:06

>>210 Isn't the genotypical basis of behavior called 'nativism', the semantical opposite of the *empirical* determinism by environment?
>>211 This I kinda knew, but until the effects and true implications are pinpointed, I'll have no trifle with it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 3:54

"semantical opposite"?
depends on what you mean by "environement". If you mean everything that is natural but non-human, non-human society, then yes. But if you take "environement" to include human society- then: No. that kind of determinism is far from "empirical".

Name: Xel 2006-07-11 4:09

>>213 I meant native as in innate, irremovable save through genetic modification or other whack procedures. You can do something about your human-made environment, hence I consider it empirical.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 6:26

>>214

Who is "You" and what are you saying could be done in all those various "situations" (colonialism, slavery, etc)? Given some of what you've said on these boards is sounds like you're not really convinced that human society by large is "empirical". Entire generations of people starting out with a better foot hold than others is far from "empircial" . Think about what you're saying, Xel.

Name: Xel 2006-07-11 6:45

>>215 It is empirical, in a way, but I understand I have not been sufficently clear here. But look to all the other posts I have posted apropos defense of social security; the basis of my argument is that the empirical, equal opportunity ideal is taken for granted in America, and that the influence of the environment is so strong that an individual can NOT be responsible for her situation. It's a question of semantics, but I assure you that while I believe that total social equality is impossible, I also believe that we are determined by our environments. The reason I call it empirical is because self-made change is possible, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the US is a meritocracy.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 7:11

...you shouldn't have used "empirical". :) Still kinda sorta doesn't make sense.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 10:00

>>217

I guess what I'm asking is: How can human society be "empirical", when people (some in this very thread) don't make decisions, policies, etc...that effect society, empirically?

Name: Xel 2006-07-11 10:58

>>218 Well, all of our actions have an effect. From voting, to objecting when we hear homophobic jokes or any type of human interaction we change our environment. We still have the power, but the less effective and tight a system is the more institutions can have a shot at marginalizing us. And no, I'm not only talking about big gov.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 11:03

>>219

That's not exactly "empirical"

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 14:39

>>212
Caucasian (whites, arabs, slavs, indians) and mongoloid (chinese, polynesian, native american) skulls are observably similiar and the archaeologicaly history of these races are large and extensive. The contrast between isolated tropical civilisations of central and southern america and the african civilisations who were readily exposed to the technology of the middle east and northern africa are enormous. East Africa was largely developped, but this is due to extensive trade with caucasians living in the arabian peninsula. There are genetic differences, we just haven't found them yet. There is already sufficient proof to determine that there are differences between the negroid race and the rest of humanity. Your argument is contradictory also, people 100 years ago did not know which genes caused the heart to exist, this of course does not mean they should have believed the heart didn't exist.

Of course the law of averages means that many negroes are of superior intelligence to the average white, arab and asian. So there should be no incentive for you to find ways of getting people to ignore facts out of fear it might cause discrimination. If you are of a lower IQ than average and fear you will not be allowed to have children, the law of liberty means that you are free to have children and that you are merely asked out of moral conscience not to pass your inferior genes to future generations.

>>215
Blacks had plenty of time and exposure to the latest technology before the powerful islamic caliphates began to colonise african civilisation seriously reducing any chance they had of developping an economic-military structure to defend themselves. Human first evolved in africa, but they had stayed in the same environment so long that evolution had slowed. Humans had migrated out of africa before hand, but this was before humans in africa evolved the "creativity gene". Contrasting cro-magnon with neanderthal it can be seen that a point had been crossed where humans evolved further intelligence instead of changes in physiology to adapt to new environments. Evolution in Africa was as slow as it had been before, but evolution in ice age europe and the rest of the world was accelerated by the new environment.

Once again I would like to stress that black africans are sentient and must be treated with the human rights they deserve and that the law of averages means that eugenics should be race indiscriminate.

Name: Xel 2006-07-11 16:03

>>221 Bump for good information and sanity. I'll take it with a pinch of salt but I won't scream "Lester Maddox!".

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 18:22

>>221

Blah, Blah, Blah, this is the same bullshit know-nothing argument that you faggots made in Race Thread and Anti-Chan and several others destroyed you on it. Consistantly. "Creativity Gene"? Are you serious? Whites (and all other races) have been trying to pass themselves off as some kind of special super race for ages--- This is entire argument is rendered nebulous because no matter what you may truly feel in your heart (REGARDLESS of your RACE)--- you cannot maintain the proper amount of objectivity to discuss these so called "Facts". Mankind cannot properly gauge his own "IQ" (or even what intelligence is) by proxy of the fact you absolute objectivity cannot be gain by the means used.

While I appreciate your lame disclaiming attempts at "stressing that black africans must be treated with human rights" you still need 1000CC's of fucking reality. They weren't respected as humans before, some don't treat them as humans now, we (humans on a whole) didn't even respect JEWS, CHINESE, JAPANESE etc. Your faith that somehow we'll not treat others as underclass is INSTANTLY shot to shit because we are currently living in the kind of world you're talking about. If we weren't then all this eugenics, IQ nonsense would mean fuck all.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 19:18

NIGGERS GET OUT

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 21:04

>>224
agreed

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-12 9:35

>>223 If you had read my argument properly you would have seens that I clearly stated that all humans have the "creativity gene". You possibly did not read it properly as you are sick and tired of racists and believed it would be a waste of time, since this is 4chan there is not much else I can do except ask you kindly to give me a try. I put the "creativity gene" in double apostrophes because it is based on observable differences between neanderthals and humans, being that neanderthals left very little except bones split to get marrow and very few varieties of stone tools, humans on the other hands had a myriad of musical instruments, cave paintings, needles, many different intricately carved stone tools and developped the bow and throwing spear. There is obviously a difference and I coined it the "creativity gene". I understand that humanity can be very malicious and insidious, however I believe that this is usually because the truth is suppressed and that this leads to paranoia. How can you expect a person to respect the rights of man and not direct his efforts selfishly if he sees the truth being denied by the people he is supposed to respect? All queries must be answerred, all dilemmas resolved and all answers plain and clear for all to see with the facts to back them up otherwise people will look to extremists for answers.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-12 9:54

lol politix

Name: Xel 2006-07-12 11:31

>>226 Bump for general truth. I still don't feel any consideration of the subject as relevant but the effort is inspiring.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-12 15:08

>>226

1. Find this "Creativity Gene"
2. Find the gene that controls IQ
3. ???
4. Go puff on a dick.

>>228

You don't even know what you're bumping, Xel. "People will look to extremists for answers"? Ok, but >>221, or anything dealing with your meritocratic-eugenics society isn't "the answer" nor is it "the truth" nor is it "fact". There's a difference between co-relation and empirical evidence glean through scientific method.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 1:16

>>229
All evidence is empirical, the proof for the existence of the roman empire is entirely empirical, this does not mean it is not for certain. My statements showed direct connections between the evidence used.

Neanderthals were about as distant genetically from humans as donkeys are from horses. Assuming humans and neanderthals had the same genes which influence creativity, considerring the likely hood of neanderthals never coming up with the ideas humans did, this premise must be false. There is only 1 other possibility which is that neanderthals did not have the same genes as humans that influenced creativity, so humans by 70000 years ago had evolved certain genes that allowed them the mental capacity to show such superior creativity when compared to the neanderthals.

Different genes exist, the only thing in question is the extent of this effect between different races since races have distinct genetic markers and these must affect their mental and physical performance to a certain degree.

Sub-saharra africa was exposed to the earliest technology developped, long before the arabs or whites began to colonise the area they had the latest methods of producing iron aswell as access to a large range of domesticated animals, technology for sea vessels and crops.

Central and southern america was physically seperated from the rest of the world, they were still in the bronze age whilst europe's rennaissance was in full swing and the spaniards invaded. However they had a much more sophisticated civilisation than any that existed in pre-colonial sub-saharra africa even with access to the technology of the rest of the world. Central america's climate is similiar to that of today's west africa and Angola. The Kingdom of Aksum and other sophisticared East African civilisations were heavily influenced (genetically and culturally) by the caucasian-arabs as indicated by larger cities and technology particularly naval technology and were dominated by them in the 8ths and 7ths centuries as the caliphates extended their power.

The Aztecs were in a state of constant war with their neighbours and the mayan civilisation had previously experienced a major disaster. Central american civilisation had an abysmal environmental disadvantage compared to sub-saharra Africa, yet today there are astronomically more archaeological remains there when compared to sub-saharran Africa. The only factor left is the genetic factor, or of course pure luck, but considerring Africans had 5000 years with little intrusion and millions of people even with extremely good luck it can only mean that genetics is the main cause of this discrepancy.

Please tell me which facts you wish to deny to make this argument easier, speaking from the heart now, I really can't be botherred to do the thinking for you and I get the impression you asked such a dim question and resorted to name calling because you know I am right and believe your only hope is to fillibuster. Please do the right thing, if all liberals stopped trying to deny the truth they would attract many people who would have otherwise supported racist movements practically ending racism.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-14 0:47

>>230

"Fillibuster"?

How about this: GB2/race thread

The only person fillibustering right now is you. We already had the race debate, remember? You guys lost. Now, you can continue to repeat "this r teh truf" dogmatically if you want but there's no way you're going slide statements like "My statements showed direct connections between the evidence used." pass as "empirical evidence".

You are making a co-relation without identifying and articulating the mechanism. That isn't science. Where are the "creativity genes"? Where are the "use technology genes"? No one knows! But supposedly they are there. So, I guess we'll just take your word for it, eh? Intelligence is a barely observable, nebulous phenomina that we can never fully grasp objectively. To claim that you have "empirical evidence" in this regard is laughable.

Reason #1 that I'm being so short with you is because in addition to being incredibly gullible, naive and dense...you're also tying this in as a political issue. I'm not a "Liberal", you fucking idiot.

With that said, you still refute to address the fact that even if you are correct it would mean that we already live in genetic meritocracy. Are you afraid of this observation? Finally...your faith that "people just need the truth" is the stuff of comic books. In this case- it wouldn't change a god damn thing-- the ignorant masses that discriminate against blacks and other races don't really need a reason to hate. Those that were on the fence will feel entirely justified in discriminatory behaviors. This is the kind of social climate that has lead to geocides all over the world. You think "truth" is going to change our nature? When it comes to hate and to opressing other, truth and lies are virtually indistinguishable. 

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-17 14:06

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-18 2:29

>>231
"We already had the race debate, remember? You guys lost."
So you keep saying, yet I have never actually heard you contend the argument against the logical fallacy you keep using over and over again.

"You are making a co-relation without identifying and articulating the mechanism."
Where is the mechanism in addition and subtraction? How can you prove that the + sign is an actual physical entity that can be picked up and waved around for everyone to see? What about the individual numbers, what are their mechanisms? Or does a person have to re-define the concept of numbers when they are looking at 8 oranges, 8 apples or measuring 8 metres?

The reason why maths is accepted even though it is not a mechanism is because it is an observable phenomena, just like the failure of the negro race as my facts prove. I am assuming now you are not contributing any more environmental factors to the comparison between negro and native american progress as I have pretty much coverred everything. Negros had plenty of time and exposure to technology to develop before colonisation, but didn't, native americans didn't have the same technology as the africans but reached a higher state of development than they ever did and this happenned curiously in regions with a similiar sub-tropical/arid environment to most of africa. The only difference between them is their race and we know that negros have smaller cranial capacities and visibly different skull shapes from mongoloids and caucasians. One mechanism is obvious, lower intelligence prevented negroes from rising above a gang/tribal structure and developping an economy capable of supporting the crafts needed to supply and arm an army and to compete with threats. As a result only negroes with extensive trade and exposure to arabs in eastern africa had any chance of creating a stable nation state to support intensive agriculture and early industries. With such heavy facts bearing down apon the negro race, the probability of their failure not being due to their genes is very low. Unless you have some more facts you'd like to share.

Whether you want to ignore these facts and let racists take your place or stand up and make a case for eugenics so that black people with superior genes are not discriminated against is up to you.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-18 2:40

>>231
We didn't lose the debate.

Meritocratic eugenics is not being implemented perfectly. Civilisation circumvents natural selection, it is only logical to at least take the process over ourselves, I for one would prefer my children to be healthy if it were discoverred I was a carrier of the sickle cell gene (Yes! I am nigra!).

The mechanism is obvious, blacks have lower average intelligence, thus had a lower amount of people capable of performing certain tasks that made other civilisations succesful. If you take race out of the equation it leaves a huge gaping void out of why sub-saharran africans are such failures which will never be filled with enough arbitrary evidence. The mechanism for lower intelligence throughout a race is obviously genes as conclusively proven in recent years with the advent of the human genome project.

Since the black race is only less intelligent on average and merely has a lower chance of yielding people capable of tasks that made other civilisations succesful, it is logical for you to support eugenics. Since you are a liberal-black and are very likely to hate intelligent black people and persecute and hate them for participating in civilisation you will undoubtedly have absolutely no intention of listenning to reason. However I still believe there is hope for a truly egalitarian society in which people enjoy their liberty without shirking from their responsibility so that we do not have to suffer from all this racialist bullshit.

Eugenics!

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-18 8:18

hey does anyone here cite the works of j. phillipe rushton to prove differences in racial groups?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-18 8:21

Name: ANNOY-MOUS 2006-07-18 11:06

Nigs are animals, PERIOD, there is no debat, I do not care what so and so did 100-, 100, or 10 years ago, You want proof that blacks are nothing more then walking pieces of crap with voices, all that must be done is look at the behavior of the nigs in New Orleans during hurricaine Katrina, and then compare that to the behavior of any other group in the US after a hurricaine hits.

No raping or killing any any other tyipcal nigger behavior

nuff said

if its black send it back, fuck your reparations,

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-18 12:14

>>237
Ture! I know liberals that whent into New Orleans during the huricane to volentarely help the blacks. They later told me that they didnt deserve to be helped at all. And we are talking about white Che-guevara T shirt, dreedlock liberals here.

The nigras show their true colors...

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-18 14:40

>>238
I'm really surprised they didn't get shot.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-18 18:23

>>237


It's funny because Europe during the Dark Ages was almost exactly like Africa is today.

Lets not forget how the ancient greeks and romans wern't white and the roman empire was destroyed by northern white barbarian clans.

I sincerely doubt you're of superior genetic to the LOWLY NIGGER APES though. :(

Then again I doubt most of you NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS LOL NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS ARE ANIMALS HURRRRRRRRRR are in general.

http://www.somethingawful.com/index.php?a=3183

And I'm not a fucking liberal, I'm just sick of you cowardly white supremacists who rimjob eachother over racial pseudoscience.

How the fuck does a shitty anime image board attract white supremacists to begin with?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-18 20:06

THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS WHY I'M NOT A WINNER

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-18 21:02

>>240
Your post is full of jewish lies and crap sir. Please leave this "Hate mogering" website and go back to the SA.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-18 22:02

NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER NOT ENOUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND REPARATIONS IS WHY IM NOT A WINNER

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List