Colonisation is OVER

European countries have colonised and used Africa's land and people for some time, from the Portuguese to the British, and yet we've stopped trying to "take over" African countries.  Contemporary times seem to be focused on reparations or dealing with the consequences of colonisation, instead of continued use and exploitation of the land.  Why?  Is the land that shitty that agriculture won't continue to thrive?  Are the people that lazy that they can't force everyone to work towards industrialising civilization? 

Also, how can we terraform dry and arid land into fertile soil in order to grow crops?  This applies to Africa, the middle east, and parts of asia.  There is so much unused land, so why can't it be infused with nutrients, fertilizer, nitrates, etc.

>>36
So what about the 100s of accounts of slaves being dragged across the country in shackles? If someone beats the crap out of you and chains you up and tells you that you are being brought to a better life, does this mean you were fooled into becomming a slave? No. It doesn't mean anything.

Only a few pirates were involved in the slave trade and the colonists were told they were not human, so most whites were innocent in all of this. Only the miniscule number of white pirates and the huge number of black slavers were the ones with malicious intent.

If anything you should thank people with white genes since there's was the first civilisation to value liberty and eventually abolish slavery, many whites were willing to risk their lives to end slavery during the American civil war, this is pure selflessness since they probably profitted from cheap cotton and sugar to begin with and certainly didn't profit from a bloody war. This can only mean that white genes make people more likely to be compassionate and rational.