Bob's Mantra

What do you guys think about Bob Whitaker and his radio shows?

------------------------------------------
BOB'S MANTRA
"Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."


"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."


"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."


"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"


"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"


"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"


"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."


"They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white."


"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
 

Bob Whitaker
-------------------------------------------------


http://www.whitakeronline.org/
http://www.whitakeronline.org/townhall.htm

-------------------------------------------------

Discuss..

In my opinion, one of the true geniuses of our age.

>>86

Huh? I think you should re-read what I wrote. Let this be understood: The reason eugenics isn't a viable solution for disparity in IQ is because Intelligence isn't fundamentally genetic. Any arguments for completely genetic solutions is inherantly wrong because it doesn't address the factor that we know definately has an effect on intelligence: Enviornment.

Yet, in the realm of this discussion, I think it [eugenics] is a reasonable approach to the issue. It's the wrong approach, in my view (for more reasons than listed above) but it is still reasonable. In other words: It's perfectly fine by me if he thinks the research could be used to eugenics.

The eugenics guy is not the reason I'm leaving the debate.

However, when dealing with people like >>80 (NOT the eugenics guy). There's no reason to believe that >>80 is producing an argument that's any different from scientifically justified genocide or seperatism. He'd feel the way he does about blacks with or without the data. Science is neutral, yes. But men aren't. And just because a man is a scientist doesn't make him any less likely to be susceptible to the human condition.

There is a part of your post that irks me, though.

Perhaps you can enlighten me as to where I am "getting the bad end of the debate"?

RE: From Deka et al., Am. J. Human Genetics 56, pgs. 461-474, 1995.

Read and Respond: You seem to think that study means something and I won't take that away from you, but this is what South Amerindians looks like:

www.minelinks.com/worker/jungle_people44.jpg

The humans who are the fatherest from apes are still savages, so what is your point? Do you think truth will ever make your hatred acceptable?[/i]

So what if Nigerians are closer to apes? They're still human. So what does it have to human intelligence? "Whites" are closer to apes an South Amerindians and white colonized South America. The only way that data can be relevant if you're making an argument for the inhumanity of nigerians.

I don't feel that I should have to sit here and be called "boy" and "chimp". It's funny how when I was using character attacks it was such a big fuckin' deal. But when someone else does it...it's seems to be fairplay. This isn't a debate- this a hate convention. And I want no part of it.