Bob's Mantra

What do you guys think about Bob Whitaker and his radio shows?

------------------------------------------
BOB'S MANTRA
"Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."


"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."


"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."


"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"


"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"


"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"


"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."


"They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white."


"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
 

Bob Whitaker
-------------------------------------------------


http://www.whitakeronline.org/
http://www.whitakeronline.org/townhall.htm

-------------------------------------------------

Discuss..

In my opinion, one of the true geniuses of our age.

>>70 race has no fundamentally biological expression

o rly?

GENETIC DISTANCE FROM CHIMPANZEES
HOW CLOSELY RELATED ARE THE VARIOUS RACES?
by Michael Rienzi, Biologist.


Genetic studies can provide much knowledge, and some of the newer
technologies are quite powerful and useful. However, some of the older and
more basic studies are quite interesting as well, and some shed important
light on racial and species differences. I'd like to talk about two here.


The more important of the two is Deka et al., Am. J. Human Genetics 56,
pgs. 461-474, 1995. This study looks at some genetic markers and compares
the genetic distances of eight human populations (Samoans, North
Amerindians, South Amerindians, New Guineans, Kachari [Mongolids], Germans,
more generalized Caucasians, and Sokoto Negroes from Nigeria [Nigerian
sub-Saharan African Negroes]) to each other and to chimpanzees. The data
were analyzed two ways - with Nei's standard genetic distance, and with
modified Cavalli-Sforza distance.


Which group was genetically closest to chimpanzees? The answer for both
methods was the Nigerian Negro group. Using Nei's method, the
Nigerian-chimp distance was 1.334 +/- 0.375, by far the closest value
(second closest was the Kachari value of 1.527 +/- 0.493). To be fair, and
show we are not knee-jerk "Eurocentrics" hiding data, the group farthest
from the chimps was the South Amerindians (1.901 +/- 0.529); however the
Germans (1.865 +/- 0.506) and the more general Caucasians (1.860 +/- 0.497)
were right behind them (and given the +/- values, virtually overlapping).
Looking at the Cavalli-Sforza method, the Sokoto Nigerians were again the
closest to chimps (0.539) by a large margin. The farthest were again the
South Amerindians (0.712), with the Germans (0.680) and general Caucasians
(0.667) being a very close third and fourth behind the South Amerindians as
well as Samoans (0.711) and North Amerindians (0.697). So, while the two
methods give slightly different orders, in both cases the Nigerians are by
far the closest group to the chimps. Once again, given the first method,
these sub-Saharan Africans were at 1.334 while all the other groups ranged
from 1.527-1.901, and given the second method they were at 0.539 while the
other groups ranged from 0.643 (Kachari again) to 0.712. Thus, based on
these data, the sub-Saharan African group is genetically closest to chimps.
The authors state the following about "neighbor-joining trees" based on
these data, using the chimps as the "outgroup":


    "...the SO [Sokoto Nigerian - my note] population is the furthest from
all the other human populations."


Indeed, these genetic data are consistent with the work of J. Irish,
reviewed here, demonstrating that sub-Saharan Africans are dentally more
similar to extinct and extant apes, and to extinct hominids and
australopithecines, than are any other human population. The genetic data
and the dental phenotypic data match perfectly.


Some may find it unfortunate that all these data seem to correlate with
certain racial stereotypes. However, we must view facts - however harsh -
with honesty. And if that includes recognition that certain groups may be
slightly more distant from chimps than are Whites, so be it. Of course,
White groups have "on their side" the verdict of history as to their
accomplishments compared to other groups; the European extended phenotype
is second to none. However, we can imagine that other less accomplished
groups may find these data very unsettling. That is unfortunate;
nonetheless, it does not change the facts.