Bob's Mantra

What do you guys think about Bob Whitaker and his radio shows?

------------------------------------------
BOB'S MANTRA
"Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."


"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."


"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."


"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"


"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"


"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"


"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."


"They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white."


"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
 

Bob Whitaker
-------------------------------------------------


http://www.whitakeronline.org/
http://www.whitakeronline.org/townhall.htm

-------------------------------------------------

Discuss..

In my opinion, one of the true geniuses of our age.

>>66

But the white race would have been this successful with or without slaves.

According to who? You? Do you have proof? No? I thought not. The logistical growth of the "white empire" would have been impossible without colonization and without slavery.

You're under the impression that slavery came about because of a inherant need to "rightfully" subjegate a people. It didn't. It came about cheifly because of the need for cheap (see: free) labor. Remember: North Americans blacks were indentured servants first, slaves afterwards. And whites were slaves too.

It's very convenient for you, in a losing argument, to reclassify african slavery as "exploiting natural resources". It's your way of reframing the debate so that you don't look like a stinking heap of insecure fail.

But in your narrow scope you forgot to address the element of unethical and immoral behaviors in being the exploiter. You also pathetically dodged the all encompassing points that were being made:

I.E

There's a conflict with his speak.

One the one hand, he doesn't want anything to do with slavery or jim crow or colonization. He says that he shouldn't feel guilty. [For the actions of other men]

This indicates that he realizes the circumstances of colonization and slavery were morally wrong and he doesn't wish to be lumped in with the whites of that era.

Ok, fine.

But then he goes on to include himself with the whites of that era by saying: "I'm sorry my race was successful."

Here, he contricts himself and lumps himself in with the whites of that era. So again I ask: Have I accused him of anything? No, I haven't. It simply appears that it is his undying commitment to the "white race" that has him racked with guilt.

Regardless, the one thing we have agreed on is that slavery and jim crow laws were immoral, unethical and not "fair". He stated that white "fair". He was wrong.

Now unless you have something new to say, I'm afriad you've lost. What is it about you and constantly losing to me in debates?

Must be your low IQ.