Bob's Mantra

What do you guys think about Bob Whitaker and his radio shows?

------------------------------------------
BOB'S MANTRA
"Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."


"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."


"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."


"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"


"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"


"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"


"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."


"They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white."


"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
 

Bob Whitaker
-------------------------------------------------


http://www.whitakeronline.org/
http://www.whitakeronline.org/townhall.htm

-------------------------------------------------

Discuss..

In my opinion, one of the true geniuses of our age.

>>59

You're insane. I haven't accused you committing any crime. If I have, then by all means: Quote me. Your question was about the white people back then and my response concerns them alone.

Calling the white race evil for not giving you civil rights earlier is like calling einstein stupid for not developping the theory of relativity earlier.

Fallacy. I'm not calling the entire white race evil. Just the whites of that era. And at that, a select number. I'm fairly certain most were socially conditioned into considering blacks a certain way.

So...Why is this so hard to understand? Are you so committed to your race that you can't distinguish individual generations (therefore individual views on equality and race) of people?

Slavery is evil no matter who commits the crime and no matter what they did to rectify that crime afterwards. It's a crime that never should have never been committed.

And to be clear here, we are not talking about my civil rights. I don't share the sense of having won anything like my mother or father and their mothers and fathers. As far as I'm concerned if I was alive during slavery- I'd be dead. I'm smart enough to have a sense of my natural rights as a human being. And they culled the smart ones.

Regardless the question is still posed: Am I supposed to thank whites of that era for doing something they should've done in the first place? Am I supposed to be grateful? Well, I'm sorry, I'm not. I don't spend much time thinking about white people or that era, at all, unless a subject like this comes up. 

But ~Let's review the argument I'm making~

There were white slaves and yet they were treated as human beings. The question is why- obviously one of the answers is simpleminded ignorance and racism...the other has more to do with economics (see: Mexican immigrant labor). It is around this time that references to seperate races of light-toned people ceased as well. It was a mad dash to assilimate scots, irish, dutch all the rest into one white race.

Regardless, (of the reasons) this treatment is hardly fair, morally right or "good" and that was the point I was making.

Now let's superimpose this onto what I said in >>52/>>54:

You're operating under the ignorant assumption that "whites" want everything to be "fair". Well, there's a little bits of history like African Colonization and the Holocaust that say "fair" is another word for "white dominated".

And your base-response to that:

All you are doing is looking at the facts that make whites look bad and make non-whites look good. If you had all the facts you would come to the same conclusion as me.

You seem to think when it comes to slavery the debate is about slavery itself. It's not. It's about the treatment of blacks. You said whites were fair- I merely pointed out that there were not. How were Jim Crow laws fair? Isn't what I said about saving the union exemplified by the fact that after the civil the government made no effort to assimilate blacks and bestow upon them rights that were natural first and civil second?

Finally, explain to me how precisely all of this somehow translates out to your guilt (or lack there of)?

Why are you upset that history happened?

>>60

They were considered sub-human for a reason.

You know what, man? Say no more. I get it: [u]You hate blacks. You're going to accuse me of saying "dat beez racisms" no matter what. Even when I direct respond to your questions. I understand you're not here for debate and I'm done responding to someone who doesn't even consider me a human being.