Bob's Mantra

What do you guys think about Bob Whitaker and his radio shows?

------------------------------------------
BOB'S MANTRA
"Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."


"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."


"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."


"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"


"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"


"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"


"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."


"They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white."


"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
 

Bob Whitaker
-------------------------------------------------


http://www.whitakeronline.org/
http://www.whitakeronline.org/townhall.htm

-------------------------------------------------

Discuss..

In my opinion, one of the true geniuses of our age.

>>159

Pure crap. Notice how your claim of me supporting "mono-culturalism thru multi-culturalism" ended up at the very end of the post with very little explaination of how I'm doing this.

What you don't understand is that we've operated under those pack rules and thus far the pros (brotherhood, love, comfort) have not outweighed the cons (death, destruction, genocide, conflict).

It's time for *you* to grow up, son.

You're under the deluded impression that multi-culturalism simplifies the human being. As someone else pointed out- all cultures being in close proximity to each other led to MORE conflict- but when it led to brotherhood, comfort and love- it led to the UNIVERSAL concepts of those acts. (Not white brotherhood because of whiteness or black love because of blackness)

If this is what you think being human is, then guess what? What it means to BE human is changing. The old brotherhoods and old aims have been proven as SHALLOW. And the idea that multiculturalism = mono-culturalism is something to say as a fucking cliche' because you're at a lost to indentify the mechanism for which multi bleeds over into mono.

I could go a different route here and say that humans NEED to be unified just like Europe did, just like China, Just like Japan and that every nation/race that has trouble unifying in SOME form- eventually fails.

Instead I will highlight that multiculturalism will only lead to MORE diversity. MORE people speaking different languages and understanding different lifestyles and remaining respectful of them.

Instead of just being "white". People will be spanish speaking white AFRICANS. Or Black Russian Capitalists. The door is completely open for anyone to take part in the myriad of qualities of "humaness".

Who are you to say that an individual should only be one thing (black or white). How do you not see your world view is one that has be adhered to since man began and before evolution is to take place we WILL need to become more complicated and more diverse on INDIVIDUAL levels. This is the type of multiculturalism I'm talking about. The chances of everything just unifying to ONE culture is nil- but then again I ask: If everything did unify into ONE culture what would be the harm? If whites, chinese, blacks or whatever live just fine within the confines of one culture- then why is this not acceptable for all of man?

>>161 If everything did unify into ONE culture what would be the harm?
Destruction of differing worldviews for one.  We'll begin to believe there's only one way things can possibly be, and we'll begin thinking anyone who thinks outside those lines is somehow abnormal, or a heretic.  It's happened before in isolated societies, like europe during the middle ages, and culture stagnated as a result. 

I honestly don't care.  The most nightmareish scenarios of multi-culturalism aren't feasible, and even the most annoying ones are unlikely.  I'll just watch from the sidelines as history unfolds.  I don't have a dog in this fight.  I'm basically alone, without any of these loyalties, yet I know that the reason I can be like this is because of the existence of different peoples.  I was able to formulate my own destiny by comparing it to individuals in other groups. 

You can rant on and on about how multiculturalism is the future, but take it from a guy who is basically a poster-child of it; it wouldn't neccesarily be sunshine and daisies like you think it is.

(Just as an aside, not about the pros or cons of MC but of the feasibility of it, the rhetoric about how the days of group loyalties is over is BS.  People will always belong to whatever group they want.  Just saying.)

>>162

I *don't* think it's going to be subshine and daisies. Fuck. Did I even say that? What it will be- is a change. A definate one, the type of changes that puts mankind to the test. This division among the races, racial superiority bullshit hasn't done anything for us for thousands of years. It's time to grow the fuck up, as a species and move past it. 

>>163 hasn't done anything for us for thousands of years.
Uh, didn't it get us america, to the moon, etc... etc.. et...?

Destroys your argument.

>>164

lol America
lol the moon
funny stuff kid

funny

   stuff

>>164 It's time to grow the fuck up, as a species and move past it. 

Yet more failure to understand relativeism.  Just because you think something is an improvement, doesn't mean that it'll neccesarily cause any kind of a good outcome, and labeling it as human society "growing up," is stupid.  As if there was a set path that history had to follow.  Historians, who study the way that things ACTUALLY pan out are often wont to point out how things weren't SUPPOSED to turn out the way they did, that it was filled with coincidences and long shots.  We could have easily turned out in some other way, some totalitarian society ALA china, and worldwide freedom like that enjoyed in countries affected by europe's age of enlightenment would be at best a thing in some dreamer's imagination. 

To assume that one outcome is more "grown up" than another is a pretty immature way of looking at things in and of itself.

>>166

Fails for subjectivity. RELATIVELY, I can turn your argument right back around on you. The fact that you think of my CONSIDERING such an outcome as "immature" is exceptionally immature insofar as I am 100% correct in saying that shattering the barrier of race has never been attempted by man as a species.

No shit, hypothetically, it could be a bad thing. HYPOTHETICALLY, it could've been bad for Einstien to develop the theories he did. (It was AND wasn't) HYPTHETICALLY the human rights and the elimination of a various caste systems could've been a bad thing. (It wasn't) The world is filled with hypotheticals, kid. This is what you don't fucking get.

Your argument is basically: We shouldn't try a global culture because there COULD be conflict, it COULD turn out this way or that. It's so trite that my eyes actually tastes the bile in your words. There's conflict, NOW. And any change for human beings has very rarely led to their complete annihilation.

I'm sorry, but you arugment sounds more like an excuse. One that comes from fear of things that are already happening.

Either that or you're being disagreeable for the sake of it.

>>167
Have you looked at the driving forces in the globalist culture movement lately? I'm nuking all you fuckers if you change everyone into an MTV drone. That shit don't fly with me you fucking racist liberals.

>>154
If I called a norwegian a godless chink taoist I would get my ass rightly kicked, but not because I used such coarse language.
Ditto if I insinuated celts are related to Africans even as far back as the eighth century.
I hate you culture haters so much. Fuck you and fuck your grandpa Goering!

>>168

If everyone isn't an MTV drone now, then everyone won't be an MTV drone later. You're acting like people are going to magically lose the ability to make choices or something. It's idiotic.