Bob's Mantra

What do you guys think about Bob Whitaker and his radio shows?

------------------------------------------
BOB'S MANTRA
"Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."


"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."


"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."


"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"


"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"


"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"


"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."


"They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white."


"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
 

Bob Whitaker
-------------------------------------------------


http://www.whitakeronline.org/
http://www.whitakeronline.org/townhall.htm

-------------------------------------------------

Discuss..

In my opinion, one of the true geniuses of our age.

>>127 [i]For some reason it's ok to address the possibly that, for instance, fundamental islamo culture is inferior to our modern culture...but when we start talking about possible inferiorites of cultures that hit close to your home- you can't take it and start shouting about what we may or may not think is inferior. [i]
Yes, islamo culture is inferior.  IT's true.  But that's only my opinion.  I can't decide what's right for a billion people any more than you can.  What makes this bearable is that they're slowly breaking out of it; just like we slowly broke out of our own cultural morass earlier.  As society develops, it tends to move towards greater human rights etc...  If they catch up to us or surpass us (which is possible, considering how history has tended to unfold E.G. randomly) they won't be any less Islamic, they won't neccesarily have taken our views into their culture.  They'll still have a valuable varied outlook on life.



What does and doesn't work will be made obvious.
Then let natural processes evolve for it.  My problem isn't with finding a system that works; it's with you deciding that you know what's best for all humanity.  No one should have the authority to make that decision because people are inherently biased.

>> We're talking about one that works.
Uh, OK, and this is any more proven then say, COMMUNISM was in the 1950s? 

>>  Why do you insist on arguing against the type of multi-cultural society that we oppose is beyond me.

You oppose all differences.  You want all people to be the same.  I don't see how that's any different from the multi-culturalism I'm talking about.

>> "So what if we are? What if we're right and you're wrong, huh? What then?"

This sounds like an argument a freshman in highschool would make.  You're acting as if there's one and only one solution to all the world's problems.  Maybe your solution will work, maybe it won't.  My bet is on the latter, because you refuse to take into account it's the differences between individuals and their backgrounds that enrich humanity, that give rise to the hybrid vigor of multiculturalism.  When you actively seek to cancel that out, you have monoculture, which as I've explained, is a bad thing.


>> "We're talking about a world synergy that is already taking place. "

If it's happening like this, and it isn't a movement of kooks, it's very different from what you're describing.  People still retain their own identity while taking in the ideas of other cultures.  The understand who they are and where they come from, while taking a practical approach and doing what works in other countries for their infrastructure etc...  They don't want to join some mass collective, because they still have some loyalty to their nation, or group.  We need those barriers to prevent use from becoming a monoculture, like I've said is a bad thing earlier.


You honestly, have failed to address almost every major point I've made; everything you write seems to be this cultist diatribe prefabricated in some brainwashing facility.  You haven't addressed my point about how you want to live in "powerful" societies regardless of living conditions, you haven't addressed the point about how it doesn't address the fundamental problem of human nature (E.G., we'll still fight).  

What this really seems to me to be is the arguments of people who have come from some of those "inferior" cultures.  They have gone to a western university, and just like the proletariats who fomented the communist revolution, they see what we have.  And they want it.  Rather than trying to build it themselves, they say "Give me yours."