Bob's Mantra

What do you guys think about Bob Whitaker and his radio shows?

------------------------------------------
BOB'S MANTRA
"Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."


"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."


"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."


"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"


"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"


"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"


"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."


"They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white."


"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
 

Bob Whitaker
-------------------------------------------------


http://www.whitakeronline.org/
http://www.whitakeronline.org/townhall.htm

-------------------------------------------------

Discuss..

In my opinion, one of the true geniuses of our age.

>>120
To add to this, your reasons for even wanting this unified society are fallacious in the first place.  You always point out how "vigorous" or "powerful" multi-cultural societies are, yet does this constitute a pleasant experience in all the underlying cultures?  The Persians were highly successful empire builders, and yet I wouldn't want to live under their rule anymore than I'd want to live in Saudi Arabia right now. 

To address the "Nothing we say can logically be disagreed with," point, what the fuck are you on?  Even the most logical and rational people in the world, scientists, disagree at almost every turn, and what's more, this is constructive!  The empirical world doesn't care for the whims of man, to impose what he believes rational on it.  This is why it takes so many scientists to figure out the truth; many of them are wrong, one or two are right, and when they are proven that way, everyone (at least eventually) abandons their wrong paths and follows with the right ones.

But Science under your rule would more resemble Lysenkoism than science itself; rules chosen before being proven, and anyone who shows a dissenting view would be terminated for being wrong.

Hey, maybe you'll stop clitorectomys and fucking virgins to get rid of aids, but really, that shit'll stop eventually anyway.

To reenumerate my points, your movement:

-> Is biased at best
-> Solves nothing
-> Eliminates disagreement as an acceptable state (though disagreement has been shown to be positive)

I think I may have missed one, but that's basically it.