Eugenics

I was originally going to add this to the Racism thread, but I think it deserves it's own post.

All you white-power racist eugenic-thinking morans are fucking deluding yourself.  Even if this crap was true, think about this; if all the stupid people were culled out for being "inferior" and all that was left was the people of > 100 IQ, where does that leave you?  I doubt that any of you idiots who actually ascribe to this nonsense can be very much above 110, so what if 120 IQ becomes the new 80?  All your life you'll be just a lower, less worthy specimen of humanity because of that, constantly subject to the mandates of the upper, intelligent high holy elites, and if you try to challenge them, tough beans, you am too dumb to make an effective argument.  Don't feel so special anymore, do ya?

Besides, it's not true as was shown resolutely in the battle of "I'm not a Racist but I am..." but that's outside the scope of the argument I'm making here.  I'm mostly trying to make racists look dumb.

>>15
I take your lack of mention of eugenic's legitimate use in preventing a children from having disease as acceptance of the fact that eugenics is a good idea.

I agree however that using eugenics to improve people's lives rather than exclusively prevent disease is a controversial subject. It will have to be some time before we can state the fact that the majority of people in existence today would have died as hunter gatherers before they had a chance to reproduce.

Of course we shouldn't force people not to have children or to donate their eggs and semen. However after everything is up and running and people routinely select embryos without genetically passed disease we should at the very least prosecute parents of those with genetic disease with grievous bodily damage for not having a mouth swab to determine whether they are making the conscious decision to force their children to have a crippling torturous disease. Parents should be prosecuted for torturing their children.