I think what you people are missing is

that 95% of your western life is 'haraam' to muslims (and make that 100% for women). The reason they haven't stoned you to death or collapsed a brick wall on you is because you have a very large police and military forces protecting you.

Should that collapse, muslims, who account for 1/5 of the human population, and who have been so ardently emigrating and spreading their delusions on the poor in the west (despite their hate for it) will turn very, very angry and work very hard at establishing an islamic theocracy. And then you'll either submit, or die. And if you knew anything about islamic law, you would find both options equally appealing.

muslims see everything thrown to them as a challenge from Allah. A test of faith. An atheist offering a logical argument about the non-existence of Allah? Must be a test! A jew trying to be my friend? A challenge from Allah! An scared-shitless infidel lying on the floor and a knife in my hand? Surely it's a message from Allah! There are no moderate muslims. If somehow that force that keeps them from open warfare were nullified, they would get taken up in the crowd as they always do, and they would do exactly the things the extremists want them to do. These "peaceful muslims" can't even condemn terrorism with any sort of conviction, do you think they would resist if it started to look like Allah was showing them a path to victory? (victory = subjugation of humanity under islamic rule). The 'silent majority' will only be silent until the tide is turned. When that happens, all muslims will be extremists.

See what they do to their women if you aren't convinced. And these are people they're supposed to love, but they treat them worse than animals ("worse than animals" here being a colloquial expression. Animals don't deserve harsh treatment, unless they are a threat). What do you think they would do to unbelievers, who they consider "worse than cattle"?

>>1
that 95% of your democratic life is 'haraam' to assholes (and make that 100% for women). The reason they haven't stoned you to death or collapsed a brick wall on you is because you have a very large police and military forces protecting you.

Should that collapse, assholes, who account for 1/5 of the human population, and who have been so ardently emigrating and spreading their delusions on the poor in democracy (despite their hate for it) will turn very, very angry and work very hard at establishing a despotism, usually under the guise of good, but still a criminal government. And then you'll either submit, or die. And if you knew anything about asshole law, you would find both options equally appealing.

assholes see every criticism thrown to them as a threat to their power over you. A test of faith. An atheist offering a logical argument about the non-existence of Allah? Must be a test! A jew trying to be my friend? A challenge from Allah/hitler! An scared-shitless infidel lying on the floor and a knife in my hand? Who cares if it sentient, it's not me/one of us! We are all capable of assholery and we can act like asses sometimes. If somehow that force called liberty that keeps us from open warfare were nullified, we would get taken up in the crowd as we always do, and we would do exactly the things the extremists try to do. These "extremists" refuse to admit they are capable of evil and readily claim others are evil, liberty and justice lovers declare they are capable of evil and are all under the law and open themselves to criticism, this is the defining factor between complete assholes and everyday assholes. The 'quiet voice of reason' will never be silenced, but can only be heard when the screaming of tyranny ends. When that happens, the extremists become self-evident.

See what crimes assholes commit if you aren't convinced. And these are people usually say they have faith in a loving god or some virtuous "benevolent" dictatorship, but they treat humans worse than animals ("worse than animals" here being a colloquial expression. Animals don't deserve harsh treatment, unless they are a threat). Do you think people who persecute innocents due to paranoia backed up by shallow evidence are more like the imaginary enemies the conjur up than the virtuous warriors of justice they make themselves out to be?*

fix'd