Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

.

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-29 3:45

Finally, she and some of her followers are often perceived as being dogmatic, frequently ignoring published criticism of the system instead of responding to it. This is in part because many of them were young people excited by her novels and unlearned in philosophy; such people are not often aware of the complexities of their subject and prone to construe disagreement as ignorance. Furthermore, many of her supporters would not permit modifications or additions to her philosophical system, leading some to label Rand as a cult leader.

Name: John 2006-01-08 8:21

Oh, fuck it... This isn't debate, it's just bitching, name-calling, and pointing out nothing but the negative aspects of every single fucking thing that comes up. And if there aren't really any, you either bring up irrelevant rhetoric, just make shit up, or start bitching over miniscule points that have little or no relevance to the big topic being discussed. Every fucking thing on here is a negative reaction to anything that suggests that man has to put forth some kind of effort to obtain any kind of real satisfaction or happiness. You people, for the most part, are fucking sad idiots, most of whom probably aren't even out of highschool yet.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List