I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>958
Exactly, it's genetic s and the environment. Which is why mexican immigrants are more intelligent than African Americans even though they lived in poverty with less opportunities for education and experience the same if not more racism. Because their genes favour intelligence even when they grow up in such conditions. Not to mention the fact that the genes of a race in a society affects how well they raise their children and develop their economy. A small alteration in intelligence and emotional behaviour can affect a civilisation on a large scale.

The nazis were wrong about it being 100% genetic and the marxists were wrong about it being 100% environmental.

If you had person A and person B of equal age (age could be counted as an environmental factor, this just makes thing simpler), and A was substantially better at calculus we can accertain the following possibilities.

A had a better environment (education) and
:their genes are the same
;A's genes are worse but A's environment was beneficial enough to give A an advantage.
;A's genes are better aswell as A's environment.

A has the same or a very similiar environment as B and
:A's genes are more beneficial.

A has experienced a worse environment than B and
:A's genes are more beneficial.


Unless Mexico's citizens are more well fed and have a better education than African Americans in the US, African Americans must have genes that substantially reduce their ability to learn.