I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>954
Demonstrate there is any significant non-genetic factor in intelligence, please.  Barring brain damage and/or severe malnutrition in early childhood, intelligence, as it is empirically, repeatably measured by IQ tests, appears to be 100% genetic in origin.

Demonstrate that intelligence is anything other than the net information-processing power of a given human brain, please.

You cannot.  You will wave your hands, and shout the magic word "racism," but you cannot.

In any event, this is the only logical conclusion given what mainstream anthropologists agree is the sole possible origin of the races.

Somewhere between a quarter of a million years ago and 80,000 years ago, humans migrated to Europe.  By the evidence, it looks probable that they did this either during or just before an ice age that rendered Europe a place incomprehensibly hostile to human life, particularly Neolithic human life.

The losses in those early pioneering groups must have been tremendous, yet the survivors persevered and more kept coming.  Possibly 90% or more of each generation died before having an opportunity to breed, due to glaciers, dire wolves, and other large and efficient predators already well adapted to this environment.  It is impossible to overemphasize how deadly this environment was.

You might say it had a way of killing the stupid along with the weak.  Among the early Cro-Magnon peoples, human cranial capacity grew tremendously with each generation.  By 50,000 years ago, the Cro-Magnon forbears of the White race were well established, and by the fossil evidence, had cranial capacity equivalent to or slightly larger than modern-day Whites.  Thus the average White IQ of 105-110 compared to the average pure-blood Negro IQ of 55-70.

My ancestors conquered a continent during an ice age, and my race today still bears the chromosomes of conquerors.  The Negro, on the other hand, has remained static, unchanged, perhaps as much as a quarter of a million years behind the White and Asiatic races in evolution.

This is why the White race has given the world the transistor, penicillin, the airplane, radio, and men on the Moon.

This is also why the African Negro never had any form of writing, or the wheel, or any metal but soft meteoric iron that they could only find and make use of when it literally fell from the sky--this despite living on a continent that is a literal treasure house of metals and metal ores, from copper to tungsten to gold.  This is why the Negro never created habitation for himself notably superior than what beavers build, let alone built a city with stone walls, nor domesticated an animal, nor even practiced agriculture or wove cloth until the Arabs taught them a mere few centuries ago.

And this is why the Negro always has been, and always will be, when left to his own devices, utterly incapable of civilization, or even contributing to White civilization in any manner requiring greater cognitive ability than picking the white bits off a cotton plant and stuffing them into a sack.  As there are now machines that can do this far more economically, the Negro can never be anything but a burden to his superiors, a net liability wherever he may be.