Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I'm not a racist, but I am...

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-06 1:18

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-23 18:17

>>922
>>920
>>919

You guys are just bullshitting. You're taking exception to what I'm saying without clearly stating what you're taking exception to and without refuting one word of what's being said. That's because: You can't. You either don't have the cognitive ability or you suffer from a lack of information and understanding.

See, here's >>922's trick: He pretends that by using key phrases like "Human Genome Project" and "Nobel Prize committee" it somehow brings validity to his claims about the relevance of "pan-ethnic" allele frequencies and the fact that the greatest number of halpotypes are found in Africa and yet, Africans themseleves aren't divided up into different "races" and "sub-races". The question is: Why?

It's a question of selectivity. There's no such thing as an objective test for allele frequencies or "genetic race". If they sample from a continuum of blacks- then they say it's a genetic pattern of "black features". All of this is defined socially first, biologically second. In science and in discussion of genetics it is supposed to be the other way around.

>>918

"g" isn't the same thing as IQ. There's zero proof that the IQ scores cited in this thread and in books like the Bell Curve are "g-loaded" tests. None. If you have some: Stop your bitching and bring it to the table.

|| All this shit about IQ scores being unreliable is outdated.

Ok, if you say so.

http://impiousdigest.com/cblog/index.php?/archives/62-No-One-Has-an-IQ.html
http://home.att.net/~Resurgence/L-IQgapgenetic.htm

What response do you have to the fact that IQ tests are esscentially "environmental" IQ tests? Why is it that when we have this discussion of IQ, that you blithly ignore possible environmental causes for gaps in IQ. You don't address them at all. But just because you won't address them (because they obviously take away from your arguments) doesn't mean they'll go away. Discrimination towards blacks in this regard only serve to contribute to these enviromental factors.

Newer Posts