I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>838
Seems as though you have been busy.
http//www.google.co.uk/...

Every fact in your article is either ambiguous or incoherent with actual facts. Here is a copy paste of my own. Also read this article

http://www.egyptorigins.com/ginger.htm

and respond to everything in the below post, or unfortunately you have lost this debate.

***

Your choice of discussion board is slanted towards afro-centric views and anybody looking for a legitimate discussion would be wise to go elsewhere.

"Current archeology find that the egyptain civilization did come from the south,and there was not great migration from Asia,europe,or even Northern Africa. The population looks like it did originate with the nubian kingdom of Taseti,which does hold the oldest inscription of a pharoah. The god of amon was also adapted from the nubians,which is one of the most ancient deities."

Hierakonpolis is the oldest and strongest showing of predynastic egyptian culture. This city is much older than ta-seti, and egyptian culture in the latter resulted from egyptian conquest and occupation--the tale inscribed by pharoah djer.

"The language that the Egyptains spoke was Afroasiatic,which steams from Ethiopia,and then broke off into diffeent language categories. The Hausa tribe in Nigeria speak a form of Afroasiatic,called chadic. The Hausa also have streotypical black features. I am still proud of my race and their accomplisments,and I am not a Liberal either,but I do believe the ancient egyptains were indeed black people."

It's odd that the current classification of that 'afroasiatic' language is 'hamito-semitic.' BTW, what do you think the 'asiatic' part implies?

"You mention the Berber groups that live in Northern Africa,but you fail to mention the tuarege,which phenotypicaly look like black people."

They look phenotypically mixed because the taureg are a proven mixture of mediterranean(berber) and negroid(sub-saharan african). They're also little more than a few separate berber ethnic groups who were probably 100% mediterranean at one point in time.

"MYTH#1 Egyptians were white"

That should be followed by "MYTH#2 Egyptians were black."

I've come across this page on my own time. Does 'kinghorus' ring a bell? It's a slanted article that starts and ends by telling us the ancient egyptians were of mixed race, but all the "proofs" contained within are bolstered arguments about their "negroid" characteristics. Afro-centrists are uncanny, they seem to always use the genetic and cultural work that other scholars have done and twist the language to show how the ancient egyptians were 'black.' You, like many other fornicaters of 'negro egypt,' have twisted the term african to where you feel it only means negroids. Thankfully, there will always be an academic resistance which works on neutral ground rather than manipulating history for socio-political reasons.

I suggest you take a good look at the figures drawn on Ramses the 3rd's tomb;

http://www.delange.org/ValleyKings/EP16.htm

If you come across the "periodic table of races" that's supposedly drawn here, please show and tell.

Oh, and do yourself a favor and read the entire dialogue from the UNESCO debate ... you'll see who whiped the floor.

***