Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I'm not a racist, but I am...

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-06 1:18

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-08 4:18

>>769

There have been several groups of homosapiens that have had larger brains, neanderthals being a prime one. There was one group of massive doods that we wiped out a million years ago or so. They were bigger than our predecesors and had larger brains. They were, however, idiots. The brain was big but so were early computers, it took a bit of organisation to make it what it is today.

Humanity has barely changed in the past 100,000 years, if not longer. While there are small genetic defects that pop up (such as being white), sexual selection is a very different thing to overall intelligence. Differences in looks add up to very minor genetic differences, yet don't effect intelligence. However, it will make them more appealing or less appealing, more likely to reproduce, etc.

But the human mind hasn't changed much. There hasn't been much of a reason for evolution to work greatly in ones favour or another. Africa has had it's empires, it's brilliant people through history. Just like good ol' whitey manages to be a complete moron at times. But you treat an entire group of people like crap, subhumam even, and watch what happens to a culture. That's what's happened globally, whether African slaves in the US or Europeans deciding that they knew best and completely ruining things that were working pretty well.

Newer Posts