I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>667
Just because you win an argument doesn't make you right.  It means you selected your information well and brought it to the table.  This wasn't a battle between whites and blacks; it was you refuting a specific post.  Which you did a pretty good job of, I'll admit.

I thought someone like you would know that in an argument the point isn't to change someone else's view, but really, to win.  To, hopefully, sway those who haven't decided yet over to your cause.  I on the other hand have no reason to believe that anything you posted reflected anything other than a worldview that tries its hardest to deny genetic implications for moral reasons. 

I've really lost interest, and you just can't seem to comprehend that you won.  You should be breakin' it down and dancing in the street because you won an internet argument with a highschool kid with nothing but a passing interest in the subject while you're obviously (taken from the context about what you said in your posts) a person in college with a whole lot of interest in it (as well as a powerful reason to be interested in it), as well as a whole lot of rescources to help you.

I know you're very emotional right now.  As soon as I realized who you were I kind of got sick myself; up until a few posts ago I thought you were a skinny hippie liberal white guy.  Now that I know that you're not, well, it changes the debate.  I was in it for a rousing competition (not saying I don't agree with the genetics to intelligence to success in life thing) while your reasons were very different. 

Later.