I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>617
"Now this evidence begs many questions. Are these all lies? Am I supposed trust wikipedia or colleges? Again am I supposed to trust white systematic colonizers with African history in the same way that I should trust a Nazi with Jewish history? Just answer the question."
Well, I bet we could find plenty of URLs from .edu domains to support what was written on wikipedia, for sure.  But you also have to admit that a LOT of stuff in academia is treated as fact based on the emotions of the scientists.  For example, researchers have found very compelling evidence that cro-magnons didn't interbreed with neanderthals, but in fact, in many cases, ate them.  They've found evidence that they were more distantly related to each other then each of them was related to chimpanzees.  In many textbooks now they outright decry that evidence as "discredited" (without specifying what, if anything, discredits it) because they for some reason want to believe that humans and neanderthals merged.  They set up taboos on the subject, and now, any reference to cannibalism with regard to neanderthals is for many people swept under the rug, and anyone who wants to pursue this avenue of thought may find it very difficult to get funding.

But this doesn't have the emotional impact on the general populace that the subject of this debate does.  So, therefore, the media is able to broadcast specials detailing these scientists' (I forget their names at the moment) findings without backlash from the general public.  The general public has no reason to care what turns out to be true or not, so they just watch it and take what they want to from it.

However, you know what would happen if someone put out a special showing that under the same conditions, raised in similar families in similar towns (anti-chan stop acting like this is an unfair way to lay things out, you're just destroying your argument) certain groups of people turn out different ways (they can do this study now, I'm sure that there are enough black babies and ashkenazi jew babies adopted into white WASP homes to do a study on this with a large enough sample to come to a conclusion).  That's right, they're be shuned out of ever working in anything academic or cimematic ever again, their documentary would be destroyed, their data burned, and they would sued back to burning hell for defamation and discrimination, and would be called ignorant regardless of whether their shit was true or not.

You think that the world is rewriting history to ostracize blacks, when really that couldn't be farther from the truth.